Showing posts with label Bullish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bullish. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 September 2013

Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus

Agenus Inc (AGEN): Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus - Seeking Alpha (function(_,e,rr,s){_errs=[s];var c=_.onerror;_.onerror=function(){var a=arguments;_errs.push(a); c&&c.apply(this,a)};var b=function(){var c=e.createElement(rr),b=e.getElementsByTagName(rr)[0]; c.src="//beacon.errorception.com/"+s+".js";c.async=!0;b.parentNode.insertBefore(c,b)}; _.addEventListener?_.addEventListener("load",b,!1):_.attachEvent("onload",b)}) (window,document,"script","4ffae9d6f05d1da630000008"); if (SA.Data && SA.Data.Cache) { var adata = SA.Data.Cache.get('campaign_content'); }.market_currents_list li .ticker_date_left .mc_list_tickers a{font-weight: normal} var ms_slug = ''; var article_dashboards = '@investing-ideas@sectors@'; var article_sectors_themes = '@long-ideas@us@biotechnology@healthcare@article@'; var ratings_hash={}; var ARTICLE_ID = 1676012; var ARTICLE_TYPE = "standard"; var ARTICLE_LOCK = ""; var author_slug = "ben-yoffe"; var pticker_for_ads = "agen"; var time_left; var lock_comments = false; var machine_cookie = readCookie('machine_cookie'); var middle_version = ABTest.identity%10; try { window.sessionStorage.setItem("/article/"+ARTICLE_ID, '1'); } catch (error) {}var mone_article_tags = "{gsk,agen};;;{healthcare};;;{long-ideas,us,biotechnology,investing-ideas,sa-exclusive};;;{ben-yoffe}"var ord = Math.floor(Math.random()*1000000000);Seeking Alpha Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad Finance (1) var ipadData; SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ if (SA.Utils.Env.isIPad && !/3/.test(SA.Data.Cookies.get("user_devices"))){ Mone.event("ipad_promotion_top","top_ipad_banner_large","ipad_promotion_displayed"); ipadData = new SA.Data.iPad(); ipadData.instanceName = "ipadData"; var responseHandler = new Object(); responseHandler.handleResponse = function(data){ if (!data.averageUserRating) return; var stars = data.averageUserRating Home | Portfolio | Market Currents | Investing Ideas | Dividends & Income | ETFs | Macro View | ALERTS | PRO   This article was sent to 1,203 people who get email alerts on  . Which cover: new articles | breaking news | earnings results | dividend announcements Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus Sep 5 2013, 14:35 by: Ben Yoffe  |  about: AGEN, includes: GSK BOOKMARKED / READ LATER Bookmarked

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

Remove Bookmark new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_top");

Early this morning, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) reported negative top-line results from its Phase III DERMA trial with its MAGE-A3 vaccine in melanoma. The Phase III trial was designed to assess disease-free survival in GlaxoSmithKline's MAGE-A3 vaccine versus placebo in roughly 1,300 stage IIIb/c melanoma patients. Agenus' (AGEN) QS-21 adjuvant is a central component of the vaccine and is being studied in 18 other investigational vaccines through a partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. While the MAGE-A3 vaccine has failed in melanoma, the trial continues and data from a subpopulation is expected in 2015.

Despite the vaccine not meeting the primary endpoint, no major safety signals have been observed thus far, which is being viewed by William Blair analysts as a positive sign for Agenus given that GlaxoSmithKline has 18 other ongoing programs containing Agenus' QS-21 adjuvant. Therefore, today's news, while disappointing, does not diminish the enthusiasm for the partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Moreover, Agenus has no cost associated with the partnership with GlaxoSmithKline, thereby limiting the downside risk to the company.

The analysts point out that despite the failure in melanoma, they do not believe it is prudent to read through to the other programs, and they remain encouraged about the trials in non-small cell lung cancer and shingles. They believe that the Phase III MAGRIT trial with the MAGE-A3 vaccine in non-small-cell lung cancer is the most attractive of the late-stage programs. Therefore, they reiterated their Outperform rating on Agenus shares in a research report sent to investors this morning.

There are three major reasons for continued enthusiasm: First, the Phase II trial data were encouraging, with a trend demonstrated between the MAGE-A3 vaccine and the control arm. Second, the Phase III trial is the largest of its kind in non-small-cell lung cancer, which gives confidence that the trial is powered to determine the effect of the drug. Third, a more potent vaccine is being used in the Phase III trial than the one in the Phase II trial that produced encouraging results. The top-line results are expected in the first half of 2014, and GlaxoSmithKline will pay Agenus a low-single-digit royalty on worldwide commercial sales.

Additionally, Maxim analyst Jason Kolbert believes that today's drop is an overreaction and gives us four reasons:

1. The study did not meet disease free survival endpoint in these advanced melanoma patients (3B/3C) but melanoma is not lung cancer and the lung cancer patients are earlier stage (1B-3A). These cancers have drastically different times to relapse with melanoma being faster than lung cancer (9 months vs. 3 years). Immune-therapy may need time to work, time that melanoma patients just don't have. So it's erroneous to assume that QS21 is a failure yet, just because advanced melanoma patients did not broadly benefit, i.e. this does not mean that QS-21 does not work in earlier stage lung cancer patients or gene signature sub-group or patients.

2. Gene Signature is also a primary endpoint and has yet to report. Gene signature patients (those patients who may be more likely to benefit from immune therapy) were pre-specified as a sub-group with a co-primary endpoint. This group has not yet reported and the trial is still ongoing in these patients, i.e. this group may still benefit from QS-21.

3. Both cancer trials, do not necessarily portend negative results in herpes or Malaria trials, again, different disease, different patients, and very different immune systems.

4. The real upside to the Agenus story was never QS-21, it's Glioblastoma.

Conclusion:

Agenus has a number of upcoming catalysts, each of which could have a meaningful impact on the stock given current price levels. In addition to the collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline, Agenus has two wholly owned programs that are making significant clinical progress. The herpes program consists of an immunotherapeutic vaccine designed to suppress the virus in infected patients. A Phase II trial is underway and results are expected in the fourth quarter. The brain cancer program consists of two immunotherapeutic vaccines designed to target cancer cells in newly diagnosed and recurrent patients. A potentially registration enabling trial with G-200 in recurrent brain cancer recently initiated, and top-line results may be possible as early as 2015. The non-small cell lung cancer and shingles trials in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline will read out in 2014. If any of these trials are positive, the stock could reverse from current levels.

Source: Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)

SA.Pages.Article.handleDisclosures(); This article was sent to 1,203 people who get email alerts on  . Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Comments () This article has   comments. To read them or add your own, click here. The #1 Portfolio App is Now on iPad! Get instant notifications & never miss a critical update on your stocks! Which Seeking Alpha App is best for you? Seeking Alpha Portfolio Tech Investor ETF investor Energy Investor Email me a link to open from my phone: Continue 1,203  people received this article by email alert
Add your email to get alerts on   too: Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Tagged: Investing Ideas, Long Ideas, Healthcare, Biotechnology Share this article with a colleague Tweet SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ new Ajax.Updater({success: 'widget_email_count'}, '/form/ajax_get_email_count', { method: 'get', parameters: { item_name: 'Article', article_id: '1676012' } }); }); BOOKMARKED / READ LATER Bookmarked

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

Remove Bookmark new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_bottom"); var author_info_popup_timeout; Ben Yoffe picture About the author: Ben Yoffe Ben Yoffe picture Ben Yoffe is a professional biotech & healthcare investor and a writer from Israel. His goal is to highlight companies which he believes are offering compelling risk/reward opportunities. He believes in research, asking questions, and often reach out to analysts and CEOs regarding the... More Company: Ben Yoffe Ben Yoffe Articles (34) Comments (26) if (/stats viewer/.test(readCookie("user_perm"))) document.write("Earnings"); Profile 212 Followers 1 Following Follow.author_sidebar__follow_button_initiator('ben-yoffe') Send Message

Ben Yoffe

Stop Following

Ben Yoffe

SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function (){Follow.setFfToElements($('followers'),$('followings'),36112)}) About this author: Visit Blog:
Big Ben Investments if (getURLParam('source') == 'yahoo'){ $('yahoo_finance_link_container').innerHTML = 'back to yahoo finance'; } var page_ad_src = 'http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x251;x=x;tile=4;d=investing-ideas;pos=b;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'; add_js_to_ad_call('http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x250,300x600;x=x;tile=2;d=investing-ideas;pos=t;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'); SA.Utils.Ads.add({el:$('article_dart_sticky'), HadCreated:false, size:'300x250', delta:50, info:'http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x251;x=x;tile=4;d=investing-ideas;pos=b;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'}); if (SA.Pages.Article.see_sb_promo()){ var delegateObj = new Object(); SA.Utils.Ads.setDelegateIframeAction(delegateObj); delegateObj.loadIframeForElement = function(el) { if (el.id == "article_dart_sticky") setTimeout("SA.Pages.Article.freeze_arich_promo()",3000); } } TOP AUTHORS: The Opinion Leaders TOP USERS: StockTalkers | Instablogs Follow us Follow us Mobile Apps  |      RSS Feeds  |  About Us  |  Contact Us Terms of Use | Privacy | Xignite quote data | © 2013 Seeking Alpha document.observe('dom:loaded', function(){ if ($('article_source')) {$('article_source').hide();} if (!is_pro) {$$('.arich_promobox').each(function(o){o.show()})} SA.Pages.Article.primary = "agen"; SA.Pages.Article.init(); if (typeof(propromotion) != "undefined") {propromotion();} if (SA.Pages.Article.alpha_rich_article() || SA.Pages.Article.insiders_report_article()){ update_pro_tracker(0,1,0,0); } if (location.href.match(/source=[a-z0-9_]*email[a-z0-9_]*/)) {createCookie('camefromrta',true);} var pagination_version = ABTest.identity%10; if (SA.Pages.Article.is_roadblock()){ rb = new roadblock('article'); rb.register_show = SA.Pages.Article.roadshow; Mone.event(rb.type,rb.source,"Half Article"); SA.Pages.Article.cut_new(pagination_version); } else { if (!SA.Data.User.loggedIn() && (location.search.match(/[?&]source=(yahoo|nasdaq)/)) && !document.cookie.match(/\b(user_id|user_email|camefromrta)=/)) { SA.Pages.Article.hide_features_for_roadblock(); } } }); SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ SA.Pages.Article.articlePromo({"allSlugs":["gsk","agen"],"primarySlug":"agen","dashboard_id":10727,"dashboard_title":"Investing Ideas"}); }); .portfolio_news #content_wrapper .left_content .market_currents ul#mc_news li .bullet{* position: static;* padding:0 6px 6px 1px;}

View the original article here

Monday, 9 September 2013

University General Health Services: A More Bullish Update

In this article I would like to provide an update to my previous article on University General Health Services (UGHS.OB). In the first article I suggested that issues in getting audited and filing a 10-K/Q with the SEC were troubling. While I still believe that these issues are pertinent, I would like to provide an update to my first article.

Overview

This is the business model as described by the company.

A diversified, integrated, multi-specialty health care provider that delivers concierge physician and patient oriented services providing timely and innovative health solutions that are competitive, efficient and adaptive in today's health care delivery environment. The UGHS business model anticipates the acquisition of acute care "host" hospitals and the development and operation of regional health networks within a defined radius of each host hospital that can provide services under the Company's acute care licenses. Such regional health networks and ancillary services will reflect a vertically integrated, diversified system, which will include provider-based "Hospital Outpatient Departments" (HOPDs) of the host hospitals and may consist of Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Free-Standing Emergency Rooms, Free-Standing Procedure Facilities, Diagnostic Imaging Treatment Facilities, HBOT/Wound Care Centers, and/or other ancillary service provider."

UGHS went public in 2011 by a reverse merger. On March 10, 2011 UGH Partnerships was acquired by SeaBridge Freight Corp., which was a Nevada corporation. At the same time SeaBridge changed its name to University General Health Systems, Inc. The newly named UGHS immediately divested itself of the freight transport service between Port Manatee in Tampa, Florida and Brownsville, Texas.

UGHS has not filed a 2012 annual report (10-K) and has not filed 10-Qs for the first and second quarter this year. UGHS has had problems getting an audit after switching auditors and has since returned to its original auditor. The information from UGHS we have currently is this presentation from the company website posted this June. The next slides are from this presentation.


(Click to enlarge)

The occupancy rates are well above the industry average and the unique and profitable business model has higher margin than more traditional models as well as lower operating costs.

Ecosystem


(Click to enlarge)

The ecosystem provided by the three separate business segments. The hospital segment, the senior living segment, and the support services segment.

Red Flags Remain

I still have concerns about this company, and due to the limited amount of publicly available information is a concern. Obviously the company needs the auditors blessing before it can file 10-K and 10-Q. Still, the company has made some moves recently that should be concerning. UGHS has paid NBT Equities Research to promote the stock. Granted there have been no hard mailers, but you can see the sponsored research here. Here is the disclaimer from the research article.


(Click to enlarge)

Update

In my first article on of the biggest red flags for me was the quote in the OTC Journal article in which Larry Isen, the author of OTC Journal, claimed that he had spoken with the CEO.

"I've interviewed the CEO, and he assured me all their filings would be brought up to date by the Q2 deadline. This means the company has to file its 2012 annual 10k, Q1'13 March quarterly numbers, and Q2'13 June quarterly numbers- all by August 15th."

When I saw that no filings came on the Q2 deadline, this raised a red flag for me. I have since spoken with several people at the company, and they do not believe the quote to be accurate. As such, part of the basis for my argument against UGHS is now invalid, I believe.

The company released a market update for the second quarter today by this press release. It announced certain preliminary information regarding the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The company reported that Average Daily Census ("ADC") levels at its flagship hospital in Houston increased by approximately 20%, when compared with the prior-year quarter, while occupancy rates continued to improve at University General Hospital - Dallas, which was acquired in December 14, 2012. Surgical volumes at University General Hospital in Houston rose approximately 28% relative to the second quarter of 2012, while the Dallas hospital reported approximately 53% increase in surgical volumes relative to the month of December 2012.

"We are very pleased to announce that ADC levels and surgery volumes at our flagship Houston hospital have continued to post consistent growth, year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, for ten consecutive quarters," stated Hassan Chahadeh, M.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of University General Health System, Inc. "We would expect this to be evident in our financial performance for the second quarter and first half of 2013."

UGHS also said that they are planning to file with the SEC as soon as possible. Given that I cannot verify if the quote regarding Q2 filing in the OTC Journal is accurate, it no longer plays into my short thesis and therefore I have changed my view. While I still have concerns about the 10-Q/K filings, I would no longer recommend a short.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Monday, 2 September 2013

University General Health Services: A More Bullish Update

In this article I would like to provide an update to my previous article on University General Health Services (UGHS.OB). In the first article I suggested that issues in getting audited and filing a 10-K/Q with the SEC were troubling. While I still believe that these issues are pertinent, I would like to provide an update to my first article.

Overview

This is the business model as described by the company.

A diversified, integrated, multi-specialty health care provider that delivers concierge physician and patient oriented services providing timely and innovative health solutions that are competitive, efficient and adaptive in today's health care delivery environment. The UGHS business model anticipates the acquisition of acute care "host" hospitals and the development and operation of regional health networks within a defined radius of each host hospital that can provide services under the Company's acute care licenses. Such regional health networks and ancillary services will reflect a vertically integrated, diversified system, which will include provider-based "Hospital Outpatient Departments" (HOPDs) of the host hospitals and may consist of Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Free-Standing Emergency Rooms, Free-Standing Procedure Facilities, Diagnostic Imaging Treatment Facilities, HBOT/Wound Care Centers, and/or other ancillary service provider."

UGHS went public in 2011 by a reverse merger. On March 10, 2011 UGH Partnerships was acquired by SeaBridge Freight Corp., which was a Nevada corporation. At the same time SeaBridge changed its name to University General Health Systems, Inc. The newly named UGHS immediately divested itself of the freight transport service between Port Manatee in Tampa, Florida and Brownsville, Texas.

UGHS has not filed a 2012 annual report (10-K) and has not filed 10-Qs for the first and second quarter this year. UGHS has had problems getting an audit after switching auditors and has since returned to its original auditor. The information from UGHS we have currently is this presentation from the company website posted this June. The next slides are from this presentation.


(Click to enlarge)

The occupancy rates are well above the industry average and the unique and profitable business model has higher margin than more traditional models as well as lower operating costs.

Ecosystem


(Click to enlarge)

The ecosystem provided by the three separate business segments. The hospital segment, the senior living segment, and the support services segment.

Red Flags Remain

I still have concerns about this company, and due to the limited amount of publicly available information is a concern. Obviously the company needs the auditors blessing before it can file 10-K and 10-Q. Still, the company has made some moves recently that should be concerning. UGHS has paid NBT Equities Research to promote the stock. Granted there have been no hard mailers, but you can see the sponsored research here. Here is the disclaimer from the research article.


(Click to enlarge)

Update

In my first article on of the biggest red flags for me was the quote in the OTC Journal article in which Larry Isen, the author of OTC Journal, claimed that he had spoken with the CEO.

"I've interviewed the CEO, and he assured me all their filings would be brought up to date by the Q2 deadline. This means the company has to file its 2012 annual 10k, Q1'13 March quarterly numbers, and Q2'13 June quarterly numbers- all by August 15th."

When I saw that no filings came on the Q2 deadline, this raised a red flag for me. I have since spoken with several people at the company, and they do not believe the quote to be accurate. As such, part of the basis for my argument against UGHS is now invalid, I believe.

The company released a market update for the second quarter today by this press release. It announced certain preliminary information regarding the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The company reported that Average Daily Census ("ADC") levels at its flagship hospital in Houston increased by approximately 20%, when compared with the prior-year quarter, while occupancy rates continued to improve at University General Hospital - Dallas, which was acquired in December 14, 2012. Surgical volumes at University General Hospital in Houston rose approximately 28% relative to the second quarter of 2012, while the Dallas hospital reported approximately 53% increase in surgical volumes relative to the month of December 2012.

"We are very pleased to announce that ADC levels and surgery volumes at our flagship Houston hospital have continued to post consistent growth, year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, for ten consecutive quarters," stated Hassan Chahadeh, M.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of University General Health System, Inc. "We would expect this to be evident in our financial performance for the second quarter and first half of 2013."

UGHS also said that they are planning to file with the SEC as soon as possible. Given that I cannot verify if the quote regarding Q2 filing in the OTC Journal is accurate, it no longer plays into my short thesis and therefore I have changed my view. While I still have concerns about the 10-Q/K filings, I would no longer recommend a short.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

BioCryst: I Am Bullish On The BCX4161 Story

As of intraday Aug. 26, 2013, BioCryst's (BCRX) stock has risen ~3.4x since July 18, 2013. The major driver of the stock increase is positive Phase I clinical data for BCX4161 in healthy subjects reported on July 22, 2013. Shortly after that, the FDA lifted the clinical hold on the drug compound, which allows the company to include U.S. clinical sites in its upcoming Phase IIb trial. BCX4161 is a compound being developed as an oral prophylactic treatment for patients suffering from hereditary angioedema (HAE). BCRX is preparing for a Phase IIa proof-of-concept trial of BCX4161 in HAE patients, which will begin in Q4 2013. I am optimistic on the outlook for the Phase IIa trial and believe that its success could drive the market value of BCRX up to $1 billion (at minimum, 2x-3x of its current value).

HAE Market

HAE is a rare and sometimes fatal autosomal dominant disorder characterized by episodic swelling of the skin, pharynx, larynx, GI tract, genitals, and extremities. It is estimated that there are ~6,000 HAE patients in the U.S. and ~15,000 HAE patients worldwide. Plasma kallikrein is a proven target in the treatment of HAE. Cinryze, a kallikrein inhibitor from ViroPharma (VPHM), is the only approved prophylactic therapy for HAE in both the U.S. and the EU. To prevent HAE attacks, Cinryze is administrated through IVs every three or four days and each administration takes about 10 minutes to complete. Cinryze sales reached $327 million in 2012 and have grown at an average rate of 36% per year since its launch in 2010. The annual cost per patient for Cinryze treatment is estimated to be between $300,000 and $400,000. Thus, $327 million in sales translates to 934 patients being treated by Cinryze. If no new therapy is approved, I expect that Cinryze sales will grow at 20%-30% annually in the foreseeable future.

BCX4161

BCX4161 is a plasma kallikrein inhibitor being developed as a better alternative to Cinryze. One major advantage of BCX4161 over Cinryze is that it is orally administrated. Currently, there is no oral treatment for HAE. BCRX reported positive BCX4161 Phase I clinical trial data on July 22, 2013. The study was conducted in the U.K., and 87 healthy subjects completed the study with median age of 31 years. Thirty subjects received a single dose of BCX4161 from 50 mg up to 1,000 mg, while another 40 subjects received 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg, or 800 mg of BCX4161 every eight hours for seven days. The rest of the patients received a placebo. Oral BCX4161 was found to inhibit plasma kallikrein throughout the dosing interval when compared to a placebo with p < 0.0001. The compound was generally safe and there were no severe adverse events observed among the subjects.

The company plans to initiate a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover Phase IIa trial in Germany in Q4 2013. Approximately 25 high attack rate (at least once per week) HAE patients will be enrolled. The primary endpoint will be attack frequency, and secondary endpoints will include safety and tolerability, attack severity, and quality of life. BCRX is also planning to initiate a Phase IIb trial in the U.S. next year.

Near-Term Catalysts

One major near-term catalyst for BCRX is the Phase IIa trial data release in the first half of 2014. I am optimistic regarding the trial success for two reasons: One, the science behind kallikrein inhibition to treat HAE is well-validated. Bradykinin is a predominant mediator leading to HAE attacks. The only way to make bradykinin in human plasma is through the kallikrein pathway. Thus, as long as meaningful kallikrein inhibition is achieved, the disease will be alleviated. Two, BCX4161 has demonstrated impressive efficacy data in inhibiting kallikrein and acceptable safety data in the Phase I trial.

The FDA has been flexible in approving organ drugs like BCX4161. Since 2007, there have been more than 90 orphan drugs approved in the U.S., more than 20 of which were approved based on single-arm, small-patient size trials. ViroPharma's Cinryze was approved based on a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover, routine prophylaxis trial of 22 patients. The primary focus of the trial was frequency and duration of attacks, days of swelling, and severity of attacks. For patients on Cinryze in the trial, the response varied, with four patients experiencing no attacks and two patients experiencing more attacks. The most common side effects included headache, nausea, rash, and vomiting. Overall, I think that BCX4161 will likely be approved by the FDA based on positive Phase II data.

Stock Valuation

With a recent $20 million public offering, the company now has enough cash to operate going into 2015. With the current schedule, BCX4161 is likely to be approved in 2015 with positive Phase II data. Once approved, I believe that BCR4161 will be dominant over Cinryze in the HAE market because it is orally dosed as opposed to IV administration for Cinryze. Assuming BCX4161 sales of $1 billion by the end of 2017 (~3,000 patients), a terminal EV/revenue ratio of 3, and a discount rate of 30%, BCRX's target market value by year-end will be $1.05 billion. That is ~2.8x higher than its current value of ~$377 million as of intraday Aug. 26, 2013. With a discount rate of 40%, BCRX's target market value by year-end will be $0.78 billion, which is ~2x higher than its current value. Thus, I think that the stock is undervalued and will rise significantly with a positive Phase IIa trial data in the first half of 2014.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)

How would you like your alerts on   delivered?

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_bottom");

View the original article here