Showing posts with label Weight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Weight. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 August 2013

Money motivates employees to lose weight

Main Category: Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 17 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Money motivates employees to lose weight
not yet ratednot yet rated

Financial incentives can be a very effective tool in encouraging employees to lose weight at companies that offer their workers those types of programs, research from a University of Texas at Arlington economics assistant professor shows.

Joshua Price, a UT Arlington assistant professor of economics, teamed with Cornell University Professor John Cawley to perform a case study on an employer-sponsored program that offered financial incentives for weight loss.

The study was accepted for publication in The Journal of Health Economics and was featured recently on its website. It is scheduled be published in that journal's magazine in September. The purpose of the study was to examine a real-world intervention for weight loss, Price said.

"We examined how effective different weight loss programs are to business," Price said. "We discovered that the best results for weight loss were through a more regular payment of refundable participation fees. The payments seem to work as a reinforcement for people to continue to lose weight."

Price and Cawley were given access to outcomes of 2,635 workers at one company. Under an agreement with the business, the researchers cannot reveal the company's name.

"Overall, we found modest weight loss in the program that offers financial incentives for weight loss," Price said. "We wanted to show the effectiveness of the different types of payment structures offered in this intervention."

Price said the research studied four weight-loss options the company provided in its wellness package to employees.

Option one was the control group. Participants signed up and participated in weigh-ins but there was no financial component to the intervention. Option two allowed employees to join a weight loss program for free and paid the financial incentives for losing weight once per quarter. Option three required employees to pay to join the weight loss program. This option then paid employees a refundable bond or rebate at the end of the year based on how much weight the employees lost. Option four was similar to the second except that the bonds were refunded every quarter instead of at the end of the year.

Individuals who were asked to put up their own money, either with a deposit contract or refundable participation fee, experienced more weight loss than in the control group, Price said.

"In option three, we discovered that the large incentives to lose weight at the end of the year created unintended consequences," Price said. "Anecdotally, the employer observed unhealthy weight loss methods being implemented leading up to the last weigh in."

Rachel Croson, dean of the UT Arlington College of Business, said Price's work makes useful recommendations based on behavioral economics.

"Finding creative ways to improve our health is an increasingly important endeavor as we continue to struggle with spikes in health care costs," Croson said. "With this research, we can identify which types of financial incentives work best. When employees lose weight, they win and the employers win, too."

Companies across the globe are becoming more and more interested in keeping their employees healthier, Price said.

Price and Cawley wrote that businesses bear some of the costs of employee obesity. In the United States, obesity raises medical care costs by $190.2 billion annually, a 2012 Cawley study showed. Moreover, obesity is associated with $4.3 billion in job absenteeism costs annually, 2007 Cawley research showed.

These costs may ultimately be borne by workers in the form of lower wages, but employers are increasingly offering worksite health promotion programs to help employees lose weight. Employers save on health insurance premiums and absenteeism. Plus, Price said companies could bargain for better health care rates when negotiating with carriers.

As of 2012, 94 percent of large employers (those with 200 or more employees) in the U.S. offer wellness programs, and among those offering health benefits, 65 percent offer weight loss programs in particular, according to a 2012 study.

Price said it would be nearly impossible to measure the exact monetary effectiveness for companies who instituted these weight loss programs.

"It is extremely difficult to quantify the resulting health benefits caused by weight loss from participants in this particular intervention," Price said.

Price noted that the deposit contracts were more effective at inducing weight loss, and it was less likely for the companies to lose money. When the companies refunded employees some of what they paid into the program, the mission had been accomplished: employees had improved their health. He said if the employees didn't lose weight, the company kept the money employees had paid into the program.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our obesity / weight loss / fitness section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

University of Texas at Arlington. "Money motivates employees to lose weight." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 17 Aug. 2013. Web.
17 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Money motivates employees to lose weight'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Monday, 5 August 2013

One size doesn't fit all: Ethnic birth weight chart better for infant care

Main Category: Pediatrics / Children's Health
Also Included In: Nursing / Midwifery
Article Date: 03 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
One size doesn't fit all: Ethnic birth weight chart better for infant care
not yet ratednot yet rated

One size chart doesn't fit all when it comes to evaluating birth weight and health outcomes of newborns.

A new study, recently published online by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, shows ethnicity-specific birth weight charts are better at identifying newborns who are small for gestational age (SGA), a classification associated with hypothermia, hypoglycemia, infection and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.

"When we expect Chinese, South Asian and Caucasian babies to be the same size at birth, we risk misclassifying small but healthy Chinese and South Asian babies as small for gestational age," says the study's lead author Gillian Hanley, a post-doctoral fellow with UBC's School of Population and Public Health (SPPH) and the Child & Family Research Institute (CFRI).

Hanley and Patricia Janssen, an SPPH professor and CFRI scientist, examined data from more than 100,000 newborns in Washington state against two birth-weight standards: a population-based birth weight chart used by most hospitals and one that accounted for the ethnicity of the newborns, developed by Janssen in 2007.

"We found a considerable number of babies classified as small for gestational age by the conventional birth weight chart were actually healthy babies," says Hanley. "This leads to parental anxiety, unnecessary testing and increased health care costs."

"Developing and implementing ethnicity-based standards can help better direct attention to those babies who need it the most," Hanley adds.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our pediatrics / children's health section for the latest news on this subject.

Ethnicity-specific birth weight distributions improve identification of term newborns at risk for short-term morbidity, Gillian E. Hanley, PhD, Patricia A. Janssen, PhD, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology published online 01 July 2013, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.042

University of British Columbia

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

University of British Columbia. "One size doesn't fit all: Ethnic birth weight chart better for infant care." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 3 Aug. 2013. Web.
3 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'One size doesn't fit all: Ethnic birth weight chart better for infant care'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Monday, 29 July 2013

Weight discrimination makes people more obese

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Obesity / Weight Loss / Fitness
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 29 Jul 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Weight discrimination makes people more obese
not yet ratednot yet rated

Weight discrimination, rather than motivating people to lose weight is more likely to make them become even more obese, researchers from the Florida State University College of Medicine reported in PLoS ONE.

Weight discrimination is common in the USA. Studies have demonstrated a link between weight discrimination and poor economic and psychological outcomes. However, very few studies have examined whether it might also have an impact on long-term body weight.

Angelina Sutin and Antonio Terracciano analyzed body weight data on more than 6,000 participants from 2006 to 2010.

Being exposed to weight discrimination in 2006 increased their risk of being even more obese by a factor of 2.5 when they were assessed again in 2010.

Obese participants who did not experience perceived discrimination in 2006 were much less likely to still be obese years later.

Other factors which can result in discrimination, such as race or sex, were not found to have the same effect on later body weight.

Weight discrimination makes people more obese
Weight discrimination encourages further weight gain

The effect of "weightism", or weight discrimination, appears to occur independently of demographic factors, such as gender, education, ethnicity or age.

It seems that weight discrimination has other consequences for affected individuals, apart from poorer mental health outcomes.

The authors wrote:

"In addition to the well-known emotional and economic costs, our results suggest that weight discrimination also increases risk of obesity. This could lead to a vicious cycle where individuals who are overweight and obese are more vulnerable to weight discrimination, and this discrimination may contribute to subsequent obesity and difficulties with weight management."

A study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology reported that weight discrimination led to expanded waistlines in men.

Senior author, Haslyn E.R. Hunte, wrote "This study found that males who persistently experienced high levels of discrimination during a nine-year period were more likely to see their waist circumference increase by an inch compared to those who did not report discrimination. Females who reported similar experiences also saw their waistlines grow by more than half an inch. This shows how discrimination hurts people physically, and it's a reminder how people's unfair treatment of others can be very powerful."

Written by Christian Nordqvist


Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today
'Weight discrimination makes people more obese'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here