Showing posts with label enterprises. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enterprises. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

GP co-operatives mutate into out-of-hours social enterprises

female gp Social enterprises have emerged from the ashes of GP co-operatives after the 2004 contract and are providing out-of hours services. Photograph: Martin Godwin

GP co-operatives used to be a success story of the co-operative movement. In the mid-1990s, changes in NHS funding for out-of-hours services saw GPs group together to share the load equally. By the early 2000s, such co-ops were booming. The National Association of GP Co-operatives represented some 300 organisations with a membership of approximately 30,000 doctors across the UK. However, when the new NHS GP contract effectively released them from the obligation of providing out-of-hours services in 2004, most co-operatives (and indeed the association) disbanded faster than you could say "opt out".

Social enterprises have emerged from the ashes of the co-operatives. Some of those working within them effectively left general practice behind in favour of forming new social enterprises to tender for out-of-hours contracts.

"GP co-operatives is an old fashioned term now; it practically doesn't exist," says John Horrocks, chief executive of Urgent Health UK, the industry body for social enterprise out-of-hours providers. A tiny proportion of GP co-operatives do remain, but only in urban areas with a high enough population density to make it financially viable (contracts are based on cost per head of population, ranging from £8-12).

Social enterprises now account for around 42% of the out-of-hours market, with 33% from commercial firms and the NHS providing the bulk of the rest. "It's not the same as it used to be, where everyone took their turn in a co-operative," says Horrocks. "It's more of a lifestyle choice. Now, you often find GPs who specialise in out-of-hours … typically, a shift rota is available on the internet and the GP is able to sign up to whatever shifts they want to work." Meanwhile, the social enterprises they work for retain the NHS and co-operative ethos, says Horrocks.

Such enterprises include Badger (Birmingham & District General Practitioner Emergency Rooms), Brisdoc in Bristol, and Devon Doctors. The latter was originally a GP co-operative before it became a social enterprise in 2004, still owned by Devon's GP practices.

"While the CCGs [clinical commissioning groups] commission care, it is the GPs who most understand the consequences of good or poor care in the out-of-hours period," argues Chris Wright, chief executive of Devon Doctors. "Furthermore, the knowledge that no player in the company – be they director, employee or member – can benefit financially beyond a reasonable wage is vital in keeping the values of the company focused on sustainable quality care."

He adds: "There is no profit to be made in out-of-hours care, the resource is very limited, so 'for patients not profit' is the best ethos."

Partly thanks to the negative press that has surrounded commercial out-of-hours provision, Horrocks believes social enterprises are looked on favourably by commissioners. "The win rate for social enterprise is very good. As long as we can manage to persuade commissioners that what they want is a good quality, value-for-money service, rather than what the commercial sector tends to provide, which is a lower cost service but we would say dodgier quality … very often the commissioners are persuaded to go for social enterprise these days."

However, it in such a tumultuous sector, change is the only constant. Ed Mayo, secretary general of Co-operatives UK, argues: "While the most successful co-ops remain, out-of-hours services have gone the way of the rest of the NHS, towards open privatisation and, in some cases, outright service failure as a result."

Wright also warns that the commercial bidding process – in the past, he says, largely led by Harmoni – has driven down prices too much, making it all but impossible to provide a high standard of care. The well-documented disaster of the NHS 111 non-emergency medical helpline launch also provides a further challenge for a sector attempting to compete with private suppliers, with NHS Direct seemingly wanting rid of its stake as fast as possible.

As with many social enterprises working within public services, diversifying remains the name of the game. "Some [social enterprises] are already delivering good NHS 111 services in parts of London, Essex, Hertfordshire, Great Yarmouth and Waveney," says Wright, "Some are also delivering walk-in centres, minor injury units, A&E support, appropriate admission schemes and providing offender health and small community nursing services."

Devon Doctors is exploring working with GP practices to bid for other primary care contracts, particularly services such as district nursing and walk-in centres released under the Transforming Community Services initiative. Wright says it is very early days, but "we believe that our social enterprise model would ensure that contracts are focused on quality care for patients rather than extracting a profit".

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To join the social enterprise network, click here.


View the original article here

Saturday, 31 August 2013

Are social enterprises fit for the future of public services?

david haye fight Spin outs need investment to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle. Photograph: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images

Social enterprises are playing a growing role in the health and social care sectors in the UK. Major growth is coming from spin-outs – organisations leaving the NHS to become independent social enterprises. Primarily as a result of the previous government's Right to Request programme and its successors, by the end of 2011 spin-outs were delivering £886m worth of health services and that figure is growing.

Social Enterprise UK (SEUK)'s 2013 State of Social Enterprise survey, The People's Business, reported both an increase in the percentage of social enterprises that have the public sector (in general) as their main source of income (23% compared to 18% in 2011) and that 15% of social enterprises trading for three years or less are operating in healthcare compared to 5% of older social enterprises.

Discussions at SEUK's Fit For the Future conference on social enterprise in health and social care in June illustrated there are at least two groups of social enterprises currently operating in health and social care.

One is spin-outs, many of whom are competing for large contracts worth tens or in some cases, hundreds of millions of pounds. Another is those social enterprises whose starting point is similar to traditional voluntary sector organisations and who are looking to win relatively small locally-based contracts.

Both groups face new challenges and opportunities as result of changes to the NHS following the implementation of the Health and Social Act 2012. Speaking at Fit for the Future, Andrew Burnell, chief executive of Hull-based spin out City Healthcare Partnership CIC noted that: "We've worked really hard to demonstrate our differentiation from the SERCOs. How are others in the sector doing that? We are, in part, open to being picked off."

Burnell's comments illustrate two of the key challenges currently facing spin-outs: to demonstrate why they're different and better to alternative providers from both private and public sectors and to ensure they can both keep existing contracts and win new ones in an increasingly competitive market place. Both of these points are partially addressed in Spin-Out, Step Out, a new SEUK report that looks at the challenges faced by spin outs in raising finance to develop and grow.

The report, which is based on a survey of 27 existing health spin-outs, said: "the respondents were not very strong in articulating their social impact. Some of the organisations surveyed are known to have produced relatively robust social impact reports but this did not come through in the survey for the spin-outs as a whole."

There is clearly a need for spin-outs to get better at explaining what it is they offer that's demonstrably better than what their competitors can provide, however the primary focus of Spin-Out, Step Out is on how spin outs can find the investment that will enable them to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle.

The report quotes one spin out leader talking about the difficulty of bidding against private sector competitors: "I saw how they worked. There is absolutely no way my organisation can compete with them… They were prepared to invest to make sure they won the contract…We can compete with Serco [on delivery] but we just don't have the [bidding] resources."

It would be easier for spin-outs to compete with private sector, if they could attract investment for social investors. Unfortunately, despite spin-outs being relatively large businesses by social enterprises standards – with a median turnover of £2.9m compared, more than 15 times the median UK social enterprise turnover of £187,000 - only 1 of 27 spin-outs surveyed had done so.

The report claims this is partly because social investors are wary of investing in spin-out, based on the fact that: "these businesses are sometimes perceived negatively to have a limited track record as new entities, just one or two contracts, a lack of assets, to be operating in a highly unpredictable market environment with highly aggressive, professional and well capitalised competitors."

A video made at Fit for the Future conference by Pioneers Post suggests that social investors concerns may be based more on myth than reality.

Unfortunately, even if social investors were prepared to put their money into spin-outs, there is still a problem that the money they provide is too expensive and many spin outs have been surprised that the fact they deliver positive social outcomes, doesn't mean investors will offer them a better financial deal: "where social return is taken into account it does not necessarily influence the investment terms in a way that makes them any more generous than finance provided by purely financially motivated commercial investors. Yet the spin-outs, like many other social enterprises, interpret the rhetoric around social return and social investment to suggest that there could be a good generous offer on the table."

Beyond the world of large scale spin-outs and direct competition with SERCO, Virgin Care and others, smaller local social enterprises are trying to work out how to navigate the NHS landscape.

Earlier in the year SEUK and IVAR produced The Power of Partnerships, a resource to promote better working between new local health structures - Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs) – and local charities and social enterprises based on work in four local areas in England.

At Fit for the Future, commissioners and social enterprise leaders involved in the project discussed ways that social enterprises can build relationships with commissioners in CCGs in local authorities.

A key message for social enterprises looking to engage with new NHS structures is that its important to find out what is going on in your area because every area will be different. As Dr Johnny Marshall, Policy Director at the NHS Confederation, told the conference: "There's already an old adage: when you've met one CCG, you've met one CCG."

David Floyd is managing director of Social Spider CIC. He writes the blog Beanbags and Bullsh!t.

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To join the social enterprise network, click here.


View the original article here

Thursday, 29 August 2013

Are social enterprises fit for the future of public services?

david haye fight Spin outs need investment to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle. Photograph: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images

Social enterprises are playing a growing role in the health and social care sectors in the UK. Major growth is coming from spin-outs – organisations leaving the NHS to become independent social enterprises. Primarily as a result of the previous government's Right to Request programme and its successors, by the end of 2011 spin-outs were delivering £886m worth of health services and that figure is growing.

Social Enterprise UK (SEUK)'s 2013 State of Social Enterprise survey, The People's Business, reported both an increase in the percentage of social enterprises that have the public sector (in general) as their main source of income (23% compared to 18% in 2011) and that 15% of social enterprises trading for three years or less are operating in healthcare compared to 5% of older social enterprises.

Discussions at SEUK's Fit For the Future conference on social enterprise in health and social care in June illustrated there are at least two groups of social enterprises currently operating in health and social care.

One is spin-outs, many of whom are competing for large contracts worth tens or in some cases, hundreds of millions of pounds. Another is those social enterprises whose starting point is similar to traditional voluntary sector organisations and who are looking to win relatively small locally-based contracts.

Both groups face new challenges and opportunities as result of changes to the NHS following the implementation of the Health and Social Act 2012. Speaking at Fit for the Future, Andrew Burnell, chief executive of Hull-based spin out City Healthcare Partnership CIC noted that: "We've worked really hard to demonstrate our differentiation from the SERCOs. How are others in the sector doing that? We are, in part, open to being picked off."

Burnell's comments illustrate two of the key challenges currently facing spin-outs: to demonstrate why they're different and better to alternative providers from both private and public sectors and to ensure they can both keep existing contracts and win new ones in an increasingly competitive market place. Both of these points are partially addressed in Spin-Out, Step Out, a new SEUK report that looks at the challenges faced by spin outs in raising finance to develop and grow.

The report, which is based on a survey of 27 existing health spin-outs, said: "the respondents were not very strong in articulating their social impact. Some of the organisations surveyed are known to have produced relatively robust social impact reports but this did not come through in the survey for the spin-outs as a whole."

There is clearly a need for spin-outs to get better at explaining what it is they offer that's demonstrably better than what their competitors can provide, however the primary focus of Spin-Out, Step Out is on how spin outs can find the investment that will enable them to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle.

The report quotes one spin out leader talking about the difficulty of bidding against private sector competitors: "I saw how they worked. There is absolutely no way my organisation can compete with them… They were prepared to invest to make sure they won the contract…We can compete with Serco [on delivery] but we just don't have the [bidding] resources."

It would be easier for spin-outs to compete with private sector, if they could attract investment for social investors. Unfortunately, despite spin-outs being relatively large businesses by social enterprises standards – with a median turnover of £2.9m compared, more than 15 times the median UK social enterprise turnover of £187,000 - only 1 of 27 spin-outs surveyed had done so.

The report claims this is partly because social investors are wary of investing in spin-out, based on the fact that: "these businesses are sometimes perceived negatively to have a limited track record as new entities, just one or two contracts, a lack of assets, to be operating in a highly unpredictable market environment with highly aggressive, professional and well capitalised competitors."

A video made at Fit for the Future conference by Pioneers Post suggests that social investors concerns may be based more on myth than reality.

Unfortunately, even if social investors were prepared to put their money into spin-outs, there is still a problem that the money they provide is too expensive and many spin outs have been surprised that the fact they deliver positive social outcomes, doesn't mean investors will offer them a better financial deal: "where social return is taken into account it does not necessarily influence the investment terms in a way that makes them any more generous than finance provided by purely financially motivated commercial investors. Yet the spin-outs, like many other social enterprises, interpret the rhetoric around social return and social investment to suggest that there could be a good generous offer on the table."

Beyond the world of large scale spin-outs and direct competition with SERCO, Virgin Care and others, smaller local social enterprises are trying to work out how to navigate the NHS landscape.

Earlier in the year SEUK and IVAR produced The Power of Partnerships, a resource to promote better working between new local health structures - Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs) – and local charities and social enterprises based on work in four local areas in England.

At Fit for the Future, commissioners and social enterprise leaders involved in the project discussed ways that social enterprises can build relationships with commissioners in CCGs in local authorities.

A key message for social enterprises looking to engage with new NHS structures is that its important to find out what is going on in your area because every area will be different. As Dr Johnny Marshall, Policy Director at the NHS Confederation, told the conference: "There's already an old adage: when you've met one CCG, you've met one CCG."

David Floyd is managing director of Social Spider CIC. He writes the blog Beanbags and Bullsh!t.

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To join the social enterprise network, click here.


View the original article here

Tuesday, 27 August 2013

Are social enterprises fit for the future of public services?

david haye fight Spin outs need investment to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle. Photograph: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images

Social enterprises are playing a growing role in the health and social care sectors in the UK. Major growth is coming from spin-outs – organisations leaving the NHS to become independent social enterprises. Primarily as a result of the previous government's Right to Request programme and its successors, by the end of 2011 spin-outs were delivering £886m worth of health services and that figure is growing.

Social Enterprise UK (SEUK)'s 2013 State of Social Enterprise survey, The People's Business, reported both an increase in the percentage of social enterprises that have the public sector (in general) as their main source of income (23% compared to 18% in 2011) and that 15% of social enterprises trading for three years or less are operating in healthcare compared to 5% of older social enterprises.

Discussions at SEUK's Fit For the Future conference on social enterprise in health and social care in June illustrated there are at least two groups of social enterprises currently operating in health and social care.

One is spin-outs, many of whom are competing for large contracts worth tens or in some cases, hundreds of millions of pounds. Another is those social enterprises whose starting point is similar to traditional voluntary sector organisations and who are looking to win relatively small locally-based contracts.

Both groups face new challenges and opportunities as result of changes to the NHS following the implementation of the Health and Social Act 2012. Speaking at Fit for the Future, Andrew Burnell, chief executive of Hull-based spin out City Healthcare Partnership CIC noted that: "We've worked really hard to demonstrate our differentiation from the SERCOs. How are others in the sector doing that? We are, in part, open to being picked off."

Burnell's comments illustrate two of the key challenges currently facing spin-outs: to demonstrate why they're different and better to alternative providers from both private and public sectors and to ensure they can both keep existing contracts and win new ones in an increasingly competitive market place. Both of these points are partially addressed in Spin-Out, Step Out, a new SEUK report that looks at the challenges faced by spin outs in raising finance to develop and grow.

The report, which is based on a survey of 27 existing health spin-outs, said: "the respondents were not very strong in articulating their social impact. Some of the organisations surveyed are known to have produced relatively robust social impact reports but this did not come through in the survey for the spin-outs as a whole."

There is clearly a need for spin-outs to get better at explaining what it is they offer that's demonstrably better than what their competitors can provide, however the primary focus of Spin-Out, Step Out is on how spin outs can find the investment that will enable them to compete for contracts against organisations with more financial muscle.

The report quotes one spin out leader talking about the difficulty of bidding against private sector competitors: "I saw how they worked. There is absolutely no way my organisation can compete with them… They were prepared to invest to make sure they won the contract…We can compete with Serco [on delivery] but we just don't have the [bidding] resources."

It would be easier for spin-outs to compete with private sector, if they could attract investment for social investors. Unfortunately, despite spin-outs being relatively large businesses by social enterprises standards – with a median turnover of £2.9m compared, more than 15 times the median UK social enterprise turnover of £187,000 - only 1 of 27 spin-outs surveyed had done so.

The report claims this is partly because social investors are wary of investing in spin-out, based on the fact that: "these businesses are sometimes perceived negatively to have a limited track record as new entities, just one or two contracts, a lack of assets, to be operating in a highly unpredictable market environment with highly aggressive, professional and well capitalised competitors."

A video made at Fit for the Future conference by Pioneers Post suggests that social investors concerns may be based more on myth than reality.

Unfortunately, even if social investors were prepared to put their money into spin-outs, there is still a problem that the money they provide is too expensive and many spin outs have been surprised that the fact they deliver positive social outcomes, doesn't mean investors will offer them a better financial deal: "where social return is taken into account it does not necessarily influence the investment terms in a way that makes them any more generous than finance provided by purely financially motivated commercial investors. Yet the spin-outs, like many other social enterprises, interpret the rhetoric around social return and social investment to suggest that there could be a good generous offer on the table."

Beyond the world of large scale spin-outs and direct competition with SERCO, Virgin Care and others, smaller local social enterprises are trying to work out how to navigate the NHS landscape.

Earlier in the year SEUK and IVAR produced The Power of Partnerships, a resource to promote better working between new local health structures - Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs) – and local charities and social enterprises based on work in four local areas in England.

At Fit for the Future, commissioners and social enterprise leaders involved in the project discussed ways that social enterprises can build relationships with commissioners in CCGs in local authorities.

A key message for social enterprises looking to engage with new NHS structures is that its important to find out what is going on in your area because every area will be different. As Dr Johnny Marshall, Policy Director at the NHS Confederation, told the conference: "There's already an old adage: when you've met one CCG, you've met one CCG."

David Floyd is managing director of Social Spider CIC. He writes the blog Beanbags and Bullsh!t.

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To join the social enterprise network, click here.


View the original article here