Showing posts with label General. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 September 2013

Network of general practices aims to improve standards

GP with X ray Greater consistency and providing a choice of services are essential traits of future NHS general practice, says Simon Bradley. Photograph: Rex Features

Most people will have noticed that there is something up with the NHS and that Jeremy Hunt is no white knight, no matter how much he tells us he is. To expect GPs, facing a funding freeze despite burgeoning demand driven by demographic change and heightened consumer expectation, to come riding over the horizon may seem unlikely. However, that is what our new network of high-quality general practices, Quality Practice, is setting out to do.

Quality Practice is a national network of general practices that is designed to enhance standards of patient care and lift medical morale, as well as to strengthen practices by extending their core activities, share back-office services and increase efficiency, so that general practice will be able to deliver more for less, for everyone.

So, why form the Quality Practice network? Simply, because there seems to be no prospect of external investment in general practice. Quality Practice intends to bring new NHS and private income streams into practices. This may sound more like business than the caring profession but investment in primary care has been identified as a prerequisite for an effective healthcare system, and the NHS is not going to achieve the necessary shift of provision of more complex care into the community without it.

Sixty-five years on, Nye Bevan would readily recognise the general practice of today, and in that lies both its success and its weakness: personal, local and responsive on one side, but disparate and poor at working more corporately as a health community on the other. This builds in inefficiency and slows the adoption of new ways of working between practices, and, at least in part, explains the considerable variation in performance.

How can we achieve more consistently high standards? Albert, our social network platform, developed by Interact Intranet is our solution. Albert allows our member practices to work as one large virtual practice, pooling their talent, enhancing their practice and that of every member practice, with every good idea they share.

We also have a growing number of small federations, drawn together by geography, and in inner cities, the formation of "super practices" such as the Vitality partnership, which employs dozens of GPs. These might be seen as competition for the Quality Practice model but also clearly demonstrate that the need for change is not just being felt on the ground, but acted upon.

So how will Quality Practice differ? The Quality Practice model differentiates itself by scale: our ambition is to get to a total of around 500 member practices over the next four years, to both maximise economies in shared services and to provide local outlets for regional and national contracts. Ownership will also differ, with our member practices owning shares in the organisation.

They will have to have an outstanding commitment to continuous quality improvement that is essential for sustaining our relationship with NHS and other commissioners.

Setting up this sort of organisation at this time in the NHS's evolutionary stage means we have to contend with practices barely coping with everyday demands. But, working with our foundation practices in London, Manchester, Bristol and beyond, we are convinced that we have the model right. Funding is tight in practices, and so our financial model has to be solid. This was successfully tested in a public fundraising session through Crowd Cube recently, bringing in two more early investor practices and more than 40 private investors.

Greater consistency between general practices while simultaneously providing an extended choice of services for patients, as varied as chemotherapy and eyelid surgery, are essential traits of future NHS general practice. Achieving this is how Quality Practice will re-set general practice as the cornerstone of the NHS.

Dr Simon Bradley is founder and medical director of Quality Practice

This article is published by Guardian Professional. Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to receive regular emails and exclusive offers.


View the original article here

Friday, 20 September 2013

The image of general practice is in the hands of GPs

Doctor consulting with a patient People are dependent on the service given by GPs but there exists the perception that they are overpaid, says Dick Vinegar. Photograph: Alamy

My last two blogs have been advice for Dr Chaand Nagpaul, the new chair of the GPC. I am afraid I must importune him again, this time about improving the marketing of general practice. I find that GPs have an image problem. On one side, people are clearly dependent on the service given by their GPs, and surveys regularly show that 70% are happy with the service they get.

On the other hand, there is a strong contrary perception that GPs are greedy and overpaid in these hard times. And they have a very secure job, unlike the rest of us. Stories float around that two GPs earn more than £450,000, the highest earners in the public sector, and more than 1,000 of them take home £250,000 and above.

And doctors' pensions seem to be over £50,000, which is a high number when most pensions are being cut. Dr Sarah Wollaston, MP for Totnes, let the cat out of the bag on a recent Question Time, when she admitted that she had taken a £40,000 pay cut to become an MP. That means that she was earning £100,000 as a quite young GP.

I hear GPs complaining that these figures are gross, and their take-home pay is much lower, after paying for their receptionists, their surgeries, their insurance, their computers and their pension contributions. Some claim to earn no more than £80,000, and not to have met any other GPs earning more. I am confused, and I feel that Dr Nagpaul should tell us what the take-home pay really is across the profession. If the numbers are relatively low, it could help the image problem.

One result of the general feeling that GPs are overpaid is that the public does not take kindly to their complaints that they are overworked, at the end of their tether, and are so fed up that they intend to move to Australia. What's with all this whingeing, if they are paid so well? And if the government is grinding them down, then it is up to GP leaders to negotiate a better contract.

The image of general practice is in the GPs' own hands. And let us have no more talk of strikes - they are death to the image of GPs.

Doctors like to blame the press, particularly the "Daily Wail" for their bad image. I find this a bit unfair. Even in the "Wail", I find the short articles to be based on uncomfortable facts or surveys. They are usually negative, but nothing like as negative as the torrent of denunciatory patients' comments which accompany them. I get a sneaking feeling that it is these patients' complaints which get under the doctors' skins, not the articles themselves. But the doctors prefer to blame the media, not their own shortcomings, because the articles give a platform, which did not exist before, for unhappy patients to complain.

Perhaps, a General Practitioners Committee/Royal College of General Practitioners marketing exercise should investigate how to handle this new phenomenon; like making formal complaints procedures more user-friendly and responsive, or setting up a rebuttal service. These measures won't stop the trolls, but they might deter some of the habitual complainers. Every organisation has to learn how to handle the press. Recently, the medical profession has been spectacularly bad at it.

There is another way that GPs shoot their image in the foot. In their house magazines they make comments which make the hair stand on end. Here is an example from Pulse earlier this month: "I have no interest in knowing what my patients think of me. I try my best and be polite and nice to them but ultimately I'm here to manage their health, not enter in a popularity contest." Malicious hacks browse these publications for unprofessional comments like this.

Dr Nagpaul and Dr Clare Gerada have a lot of thinking to do about improving the image of general practice. It will be tough for them, as they probably consider marketing to be rather demeaning for "professionals" like them. But they must do it, if general practice is to realise its potential.

This article is published by Guardian Professional. Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to receive regular emails and exclusive offers.


View the original article here

Monday, 9 September 2013

University General Health Services: A More Bullish Update

In this article I would like to provide an update to my previous article on University General Health Services (UGHS.OB). In the first article I suggested that issues in getting audited and filing a 10-K/Q with the SEC were troubling. While I still believe that these issues are pertinent, I would like to provide an update to my first article.

Overview

This is the business model as described by the company.

A diversified, integrated, multi-specialty health care provider that delivers concierge physician and patient oriented services providing timely and innovative health solutions that are competitive, efficient and adaptive in today's health care delivery environment. The UGHS business model anticipates the acquisition of acute care "host" hospitals and the development and operation of regional health networks within a defined radius of each host hospital that can provide services under the Company's acute care licenses. Such regional health networks and ancillary services will reflect a vertically integrated, diversified system, which will include provider-based "Hospital Outpatient Departments" (HOPDs) of the host hospitals and may consist of Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Free-Standing Emergency Rooms, Free-Standing Procedure Facilities, Diagnostic Imaging Treatment Facilities, HBOT/Wound Care Centers, and/or other ancillary service provider."

UGHS went public in 2011 by a reverse merger. On March 10, 2011 UGH Partnerships was acquired by SeaBridge Freight Corp., which was a Nevada corporation. At the same time SeaBridge changed its name to University General Health Systems, Inc. The newly named UGHS immediately divested itself of the freight transport service between Port Manatee in Tampa, Florida and Brownsville, Texas.

UGHS has not filed a 2012 annual report (10-K) and has not filed 10-Qs for the first and second quarter this year. UGHS has had problems getting an audit after switching auditors and has since returned to its original auditor. The information from UGHS we have currently is this presentation from the company website posted this June. The next slides are from this presentation.


(Click to enlarge)

The occupancy rates are well above the industry average and the unique and profitable business model has higher margin than more traditional models as well as lower operating costs.

Ecosystem


(Click to enlarge)

The ecosystem provided by the three separate business segments. The hospital segment, the senior living segment, and the support services segment.

Red Flags Remain

I still have concerns about this company, and due to the limited amount of publicly available information is a concern. Obviously the company needs the auditors blessing before it can file 10-K and 10-Q. Still, the company has made some moves recently that should be concerning. UGHS has paid NBT Equities Research to promote the stock. Granted there have been no hard mailers, but you can see the sponsored research here. Here is the disclaimer from the research article.


(Click to enlarge)

Update

In my first article on of the biggest red flags for me was the quote in the OTC Journal article in which Larry Isen, the author of OTC Journal, claimed that he had spoken with the CEO.

"I've interviewed the CEO, and he assured me all their filings would be brought up to date by the Q2 deadline. This means the company has to file its 2012 annual 10k, Q1'13 March quarterly numbers, and Q2'13 June quarterly numbers- all by August 15th."

When I saw that no filings came on the Q2 deadline, this raised a red flag for me. I have since spoken with several people at the company, and they do not believe the quote to be accurate. As such, part of the basis for my argument against UGHS is now invalid, I believe.

The company released a market update for the second quarter today by this press release. It announced certain preliminary information regarding the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The company reported that Average Daily Census ("ADC") levels at its flagship hospital in Houston increased by approximately 20%, when compared with the prior-year quarter, while occupancy rates continued to improve at University General Hospital - Dallas, which was acquired in December 14, 2012. Surgical volumes at University General Hospital in Houston rose approximately 28% relative to the second quarter of 2012, while the Dallas hospital reported approximately 53% increase in surgical volumes relative to the month of December 2012.

"We are very pleased to announce that ADC levels and surgery volumes at our flagship Houston hospital have continued to post consistent growth, year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, for ten consecutive quarters," stated Hassan Chahadeh, M.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of University General Health System, Inc. "We would expect this to be evident in our financial performance for the second quarter and first half of 2013."

UGHS also said that they are planning to file with the SEC as soon as possible. Given that I cannot verify if the quote regarding Q2 filing in the OTC Journal is accurate, it no longer plays into my short thesis and therefore I have changed my view. While I still have concerns about the 10-Q/K filings, I would no longer recommend a short.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Monday, 2 September 2013

University General Health Services: A More Bullish Update

In this article I would like to provide an update to my previous article on University General Health Services (UGHS.OB). In the first article I suggested that issues in getting audited and filing a 10-K/Q with the SEC were troubling. While I still believe that these issues are pertinent, I would like to provide an update to my first article.

Overview

This is the business model as described by the company.

A diversified, integrated, multi-specialty health care provider that delivers concierge physician and patient oriented services providing timely and innovative health solutions that are competitive, efficient and adaptive in today's health care delivery environment. The UGHS business model anticipates the acquisition of acute care "host" hospitals and the development and operation of regional health networks within a defined radius of each host hospital that can provide services under the Company's acute care licenses. Such regional health networks and ancillary services will reflect a vertically integrated, diversified system, which will include provider-based "Hospital Outpatient Departments" (HOPDs) of the host hospitals and may consist of Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Free-Standing Emergency Rooms, Free-Standing Procedure Facilities, Diagnostic Imaging Treatment Facilities, HBOT/Wound Care Centers, and/or other ancillary service provider."

UGHS went public in 2011 by a reverse merger. On March 10, 2011 UGH Partnerships was acquired by SeaBridge Freight Corp., which was a Nevada corporation. At the same time SeaBridge changed its name to University General Health Systems, Inc. The newly named UGHS immediately divested itself of the freight transport service between Port Manatee in Tampa, Florida and Brownsville, Texas.

UGHS has not filed a 2012 annual report (10-K) and has not filed 10-Qs for the first and second quarter this year. UGHS has had problems getting an audit after switching auditors and has since returned to its original auditor. The information from UGHS we have currently is this presentation from the company website posted this June. The next slides are from this presentation.


(Click to enlarge)

The occupancy rates are well above the industry average and the unique and profitable business model has higher margin than more traditional models as well as lower operating costs.

Ecosystem


(Click to enlarge)

The ecosystem provided by the three separate business segments. The hospital segment, the senior living segment, and the support services segment.

Red Flags Remain

I still have concerns about this company, and due to the limited amount of publicly available information is a concern. Obviously the company needs the auditors blessing before it can file 10-K and 10-Q. Still, the company has made some moves recently that should be concerning. UGHS has paid NBT Equities Research to promote the stock. Granted there have been no hard mailers, but you can see the sponsored research here. Here is the disclaimer from the research article.


(Click to enlarge)

Update

In my first article on of the biggest red flags for me was the quote in the OTC Journal article in which Larry Isen, the author of OTC Journal, claimed that he had spoken with the CEO.

"I've interviewed the CEO, and he assured me all their filings would be brought up to date by the Q2 deadline. This means the company has to file its 2012 annual 10k, Q1'13 March quarterly numbers, and Q2'13 June quarterly numbers- all by August 15th."

When I saw that no filings came on the Q2 deadline, this raised a red flag for me. I have since spoken with several people at the company, and they do not believe the quote to be accurate. As such, part of the basis for my argument against UGHS is now invalid, I believe.

The company released a market update for the second quarter today by this press release. It announced certain preliminary information regarding the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The company reported that Average Daily Census ("ADC") levels at its flagship hospital in Houston increased by approximately 20%, when compared with the prior-year quarter, while occupancy rates continued to improve at University General Hospital - Dallas, which was acquired in December 14, 2012. Surgical volumes at University General Hospital in Houston rose approximately 28% relative to the second quarter of 2012, while the Dallas hospital reported approximately 53% increase in surgical volumes relative to the month of December 2012.

"We are very pleased to announce that ADC levels and surgery volumes at our flagship Houston hospital have continued to post consistent growth, year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, for ten consecutive quarters," stated Hassan Chahadeh, M.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of University General Health System, Inc. "We would expect this to be evident in our financial performance for the second quarter and first half of 2013."

UGHS also said that they are planning to file with the SEC as soon as possible. Given that I cannot verify if the quote regarding Q2 filing in the OTC Journal is accurate, it no longer plays into my short thesis and therefore I have changed my view. While I still have concerns about the 10-Q/K filings, I would no longer recommend a short.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

University General Health Services: A Good Short

University General Health Systems (UGHS.OB) is a regional multi-specialty health care provider that is based in Houston. While I believe that the UGHS business model once showed promise, issues have plagued the company. UGHS is currently trading at $.56/share and has a market cap of $185 million. At these levels, I don't believe that the market has priced in the issues facing UGHS properly, leaving it overvalued.

Business Model

The UGHS business model is as follows:

"A diversified, integrated, multi-specialty health care provider that delivers concierge physician and patient oriented services providing timely and innovative health solutions that are competitive, efficient and adaptive in today's health care delivery environment. The UGHS business model anticipates the acquisition of acute care "host" hospitals and the development and operation of regional health networks within a defined radius of each host hospital that can provide services under the Company's acute care licenses. Such regional health networks and ancillary services will reflect a vertically integrated, diversified system, which will include provider-based "Hospital Outpatient Departments" (HOPDs) of the host hospitals and may consist of Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Free-Standing Emergency Rooms, Free-Standing Procedure Facilities, Diagnostic Imaging Treatment Facilities, HBOT/Wound Care Centers, and/or other ancillary service provider."

UGHS operates through three separate business segments; the Hospital segment, the Senior Living segment, and the Support Services segment. UGHS seeks to acquire smaller (50-150 beds) acute care hospitals. These hospitals have lower capital costs, lower operating costs, and higher margins. While these are positives, the negatives that I will highlight below far outweigh the positives.

In an article on the website OTCJournal.com, the author suggests that he has had contact with the CEO and that the audited numbers are close to coming out.

I've interviewed the CEO, and he assured me all their filings would be brought up to date by the Q2 deadline. This means the company has to file its 2012 annual 10k, Q1'13 March quarterly numbers, and Q2'13 June quarterly numbers- all by August 15th. The stock appears to me to behaving as if the audited numbers are close to coming out, and the market will know the company is back on track. This stock could go considerably higher- likely a reverse split would occur followed by an immediate up-listing. It's quietly creeping higher, and as you know- my theme is to get you in before the breakout. I believe the numbers will show a company delivering about $200 million in annual revenues and world class profits.

The submission deadline for filing a 10-Q on time was August 9th, and the deadline for late filing was August 14th.

(click to enlarge)

UGHS has missed the SEC filing deadline, which has been a common occurrence for this company as of late.

Unable To Get An Audit

UGHS has late filing with the SEC because of the struggles UGHS has had with auditing. From a Notification of Late Filing filed with the SEC on August 16th. Here is what the management had to say.

"The Company has not yet completed its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to an ongoing audit and review of the accounting treatment of certain non-operating items related to 2012 acquisitions and federal income tax calculations. The Company requires additional time to complete the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. The Company anticipates filing its Form 10-K and Form 10-Q as soon as practicable."

Because of the inability to get an audit, UGHS has not filed a current 10-K or 10-Q since November 15th of last year. In that 10-Q which was for the third quarter of 2012, UGHS restate numbers.

(click to enlarge)

To be fair, the issue did not drastically affect the company. Here is what was changed.

The correction of the errors decreased originally reported assets by $0.3 million and mezzanine equity by $0.6 million, and increased originally reported shareholders' equity by $0.3 million at September 30, 2012. In addition, other expense increased by $0.3 million, direct investor expense increased by $0.9 million, derivative expense decreased by $0.6 million, and net income attributable to the Company decreased by $0.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, other expense increased by $0.4 million, direct investor expense increased by $5.5 million, derivative expense decreased by $1.7 million and net income attributable to the Company decreased by $4.2 million. Basic and diluted earnings per share remained unchanged at $0.01 for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012

Because of that the only real information that we have gotten from the company is this presentation, which unfortunately provides no real insight into the current state of the company. It is simply a glossy overview of the business potential. The lack of auditing is a serious concern. A press release published on April 16th, UGHS highlighted the reasons for the delay in getting a 10-K out.

University General stated that the delay if filing the Form 10-K was associated with an earlier change in auditors; completion of the accounting treatment of certain non-operating items related to 2012 acquisitions, including the acquisition of University General Hospital - Dallas in December 2012; the calculation of derivative liabilities associated with the Company's Series C preferred stock; and federal income tax calculations. The Company requires additional time to complete the Form 10-K and to announce fourth quarter and full year 2012 financial and operating results.

In a similar report from the OTC Journal, the author states that the company has faced delays because the previous auditor was unable to understand the business and UGHS has since returned to its previous auditor.

"Chronicles the difficulty they've had getting their audit for 2012 done. It was due several months ago. They changed auditors, only to discover the new auditor was incapable of understanding their business, and changed back to their original auditor. Hence, the delay and temporary lack of interest in the stock."

Some of the issues have arisen from the companies acquisitions. One acquisition I would like to focus on is the acquisition of the South Hampton Community Hospital in December of 2012. According to a press release the hospital, which will be re-branded as University General Hospital-Dallas in 2013, was purchased for $30 million and will also receive a $1 million cash infusion. The hospital, however, was the only hospital in North Texas to receive an "F" rating from the Leapfrog Group.

Will It Get An "E" It Already Has A "F"?

A big red flag for me is the "Yield" sign on the OTC Markets website.

(click to enlarge)

According to OTC Markets, these are some of the potential reasons for having a yield sign (Which signifies limited information) next to a companies name.

Limited Information

Designed for companies with financial reporting problems, economic distress, or in bankruptcy to make the limited information they have publicly available. The Limited Information category also includes companies that may not be troubled, but are unwilling to provide disclosure pursuant to OTC Pink Basic Disclosure Guidelines.

Source: OTC Markets

Given that UGHS has not filed a 10-Q or 10-K in so long, it is at risk of having an "E" put on to the end of its ticker. On the OTC Market, an "E" as the last letter of the ticker signifies that the company is delinquent in filings. From the OTCBB FAQ section:

What does a fifth character "E" indicate for an OTCBB security?

The fifth character "E" on an OTCBB trading symbol indicates that FINRA does not have information which demonstrates that the issuer of the security is compliant with the filing requirements of Rule 6530, either because the issuer is delinquent in the required filings, has filed an incomplete filing, or, for non-EDGAR filers, such as banks filing with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and certain insurance companies where FINRA has not been provided a copy of the most recent filing. The purpose of appending an "E" to the security symbol is to alert all interested parties that the security will be removed from the OTCBB unless evidence of compliance is provided prior to the end of the applicable grace period (30 days for EDGAR filers, 60 days for non-EDGAR filers). Anyone possessing evidence of compliance with Rule 6530 may provide that information by contacting the OTCBB Issuer Filings Department

The OTJ Journal report suggested that it was possible that this would happen to UGHS:

Here's what might happen. At some point, the stock might get the dreaded "e" at the end of their symbol, signifying the company has gone past its reasonably allotted time to file its 10-K. That would happen around the end of the month. The stock would then trade under the symbol "UGHSE".

While I can't say with certainty whether or not this will happen, but it is possible. According to FINRA Rule 6530, which covers eligible OTC securities, companies that have failed to file an annual or quarterly report three times in a two-year period are not eligible to be quoted on the OTC market. The rule says.

Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraphs, a member shall not be permitted to quote a security if:

(A) while quoted on the OTCBB, the issuer of the security has failed to file a complete required annual or quarterly report by the due date for such report (including, if applicable, any extensions permitted by SEA Rule 12b-25) three times in the prior two-year period.

The last time that UGHS filed a quarterly report was for the third quarter last year. It filed a 10-Q on May 30th of this year, however, that was the report that restated the 2012 third quarter numbers. UGHS has failed to file an annual report for 2012, and has failed to file quarterly reports for Q4 2012, Q1 2013, and Q2 2013. While I don't believe it will be delisted, I think that there is a real possibility that quotes will be suspended due to lack of filings.

Why Is The Stock Up During All Of This?

One would think that given the lack of SEC filings and lack of information coming from the company, the stock would be down this year. UGHS is actually up 46% this year.

(click to enlarge)

So why is the stock up? UGHS has paid research firms to cover the stock. I hesitate to call this company a pump and dump, as it is not a typical pump; it has assets, a real (as much as I could verify) business. However, I believe that when the company could not get audited numbers to file with the SEC, it turned to stock promotion to keep the share price up. While the reasons are conjecture, the fact is that UGHS has paid firms to publish "research" about it. NBT Equities Research, which was involved with the Polar Petroleum promotion (halted by the SEC). NBT Equities Research has published several articles about UGHS, which you can view here. As always, check the disclaimer:

(click to enlarge)

You can see it right there: "NBT Equities Research has been compensated $50,000 for sponsored equity research and market awareness advertising by University General Health Services." Whatever the reason for the promotion, it is clear to me that it has inflated the price artificially.

Shorting OTC Stocks

While I believe that UGHS is a real company and is in a solid industry, until UGHS can a) get audited numbers and b) file those numbers with the SEC, the downside risk far outweighs the upside. It is always risky shorting OTC stocks, but shares are currently available to short through Interactive Brokers and firms that clear through them such as PlaceTrade.

Summary

My main concern is that it releases positive audited numbers and the stock rises. If it does not release these numbers soon, however, the stock could risk becoming unquoted. As per SEC requirements:

To be listed initially, a company must meet minimum financial and non-financial standards. Among other things, the standards cover total market value, stock price, and the number of publicly traded shares and shareholders a firm has. After a company's stock starts trading on an exchange, it usually is subject to other, less stringent requirements; if it fails to meet those, the stock can be delisted. As with listing requirements, the standards for delisting shares are not uniform; each exchange has its own requirements. You can find the initial and continued listing requirements on the websites of the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market. Neither the OTC Markets Group(f/k/a Pink Sheets) nor the OTC Bulletin Board has listing standards, although the SEC requires companies to be current in their filings before their stock can be quoted on the OTCBB.

It is impossible to know when or if the SEC or FINRA will act, but I believe that it is possible that UGHS will be halted. To profit from a short, however, it is not necessary for the SEC or FINRA to act. Most all stocks that are promoted eventually crash, and I suspect that UGHS will be no different. Usually in the case of promotions you have to go through a tangled web of promoters. In this case, however, it is clear that the company itself has paid NBT Equity Research to "generate awareness" for the company.

Disclosure: I am short UGHS.OB. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)

How would you like your alerts on   delivered?

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_bottom");

View the original article here