Showing posts with label despite. Show all posts
Showing posts with label despite. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 September 2013

Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus

Agenus Inc (AGEN): Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus - Seeking Alpha (function(_,e,rr,s){_errs=[s];var c=_.onerror;_.onerror=function(){var a=arguments;_errs.push(a); c&&c.apply(this,a)};var b=function(){var c=e.createElement(rr),b=e.getElementsByTagName(rr)[0]; c.src="//beacon.errorception.com/"+s+".js";c.async=!0;b.parentNode.insertBefore(c,b)}; _.addEventListener?_.addEventListener("load",b,!1):_.attachEvent("onload",b)}) (window,document,"script","4ffae9d6f05d1da630000008"); if (SA.Data && SA.Data.Cache) { var adata = SA.Data.Cache.get('campaign_content'); }.market_currents_list li .ticker_date_left .mc_list_tickers a{font-weight: normal} var ms_slug = ''; var article_dashboards = '@investing-ideas@sectors@'; var article_sectors_themes = '@long-ideas@us@biotechnology@healthcare@article@'; var ratings_hash={}; var ARTICLE_ID = 1676012; var ARTICLE_TYPE = "standard"; var ARTICLE_LOCK = ""; var author_slug = "ben-yoffe"; var pticker_for_ads = "agen"; var time_left; var lock_comments = false; var machine_cookie = readCookie('machine_cookie'); var middle_version = ABTest.identity%10; try { window.sessionStorage.setItem("/article/"+ARTICLE_ID, '1'); } catch (error) {}var mone_article_tags = "{gsk,agen};;;{healthcare};;;{long-ideas,us,biotechnology,investing-ideas,sa-exclusive};;;{ben-yoffe}"var ord = Math.floor(Math.random()*1000000000);Seeking Alpha Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad Finance (1) var ipadData; SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ if (SA.Utils.Env.isIPad && !/3/.test(SA.Data.Cookies.get("user_devices"))){ Mone.event("ipad_promotion_top","top_ipad_banner_large","ipad_promotion_displayed"); ipadData = new SA.Data.iPad(); ipadData.instanceName = "ipadData"; var responseHandler = new Object(); responseHandler.handleResponse = function(data){ if (!data.averageUserRating) return; var stars = data.averageUserRating Home | Portfolio | Market Currents | Investing Ideas | Dividends & Income | ETFs | Macro View | ALERTS | PRO   This article was sent to 1,203 people who get email alerts on  . Which cover: new articles | breaking news | earnings results | dividend announcements Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus Sep 5 2013, 14:35 by: Ben Yoffe  |  about: AGEN, includes: GSK BOOKMARKED / READ LATER Bookmarked

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

Remove Bookmark new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_top");

Early this morning, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) reported negative top-line results from its Phase III DERMA trial with its MAGE-A3 vaccine in melanoma. The Phase III trial was designed to assess disease-free survival in GlaxoSmithKline's MAGE-A3 vaccine versus placebo in roughly 1,300 stage IIIb/c melanoma patients. Agenus' (AGEN) QS-21 adjuvant is a central component of the vaccine and is being studied in 18 other investigational vaccines through a partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. While the MAGE-A3 vaccine has failed in melanoma, the trial continues and data from a subpopulation is expected in 2015.

Despite the vaccine not meeting the primary endpoint, no major safety signals have been observed thus far, which is being viewed by William Blair analysts as a positive sign for Agenus given that GlaxoSmithKline has 18 other ongoing programs containing Agenus' QS-21 adjuvant. Therefore, today's news, while disappointing, does not diminish the enthusiasm for the partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Moreover, Agenus has no cost associated with the partnership with GlaxoSmithKline, thereby limiting the downside risk to the company.

The analysts point out that despite the failure in melanoma, they do not believe it is prudent to read through to the other programs, and they remain encouraged about the trials in non-small cell lung cancer and shingles. They believe that the Phase III MAGRIT trial with the MAGE-A3 vaccine in non-small-cell lung cancer is the most attractive of the late-stage programs. Therefore, they reiterated their Outperform rating on Agenus shares in a research report sent to investors this morning.

There are three major reasons for continued enthusiasm: First, the Phase II trial data were encouraging, with a trend demonstrated between the MAGE-A3 vaccine and the control arm. Second, the Phase III trial is the largest of its kind in non-small-cell lung cancer, which gives confidence that the trial is powered to determine the effect of the drug. Third, a more potent vaccine is being used in the Phase III trial than the one in the Phase II trial that produced encouraging results. The top-line results are expected in the first half of 2014, and GlaxoSmithKline will pay Agenus a low-single-digit royalty on worldwide commercial sales.

Additionally, Maxim analyst Jason Kolbert believes that today's drop is an overreaction and gives us four reasons:

1. The study did not meet disease free survival endpoint in these advanced melanoma patients (3B/3C) but melanoma is not lung cancer and the lung cancer patients are earlier stage (1B-3A). These cancers have drastically different times to relapse with melanoma being faster than lung cancer (9 months vs. 3 years). Immune-therapy may need time to work, time that melanoma patients just don't have. So it's erroneous to assume that QS21 is a failure yet, just because advanced melanoma patients did not broadly benefit, i.e. this does not mean that QS-21 does not work in earlier stage lung cancer patients or gene signature sub-group or patients.

2. Gene Signature is also a primary endpoint and has yet to report. Gene signature patients (those patients who may be more likely to benefit from immune therapy) were pre-specified as a sub-group with a co-primary endpoint. This group has not yet reported and the trial is still ongoing in these patients, i.e. this group may still benefit from QS-21.

3. Both cancer trials, do not necessarily portend negative results in herpes or Malaria trials, again, different disease, different patients, and very different immune systems.

4. The real upside to the Agenus story was never QS-21, it's Glioblastoma.

Conclusion:

Agenus has a number of upcoming catalysts, each of which could have a meaningful impact on the stock given current price levels. In addition to the collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline, Agenus has two wholly owned programs that are making significant clinical progress. The herpes program consists of an immunotherapeutic vaccine designed to suppress the virus in infected patients. A Phase II trial is underway and results are expected in the fourth quarter. The brain cancer program consists of two immunotherapeutic vaccines designed to target cancer cells in newly diagnosed and recurrent patients. A potentially registration enabling trial with G-200 in recurrent brain cancer recently initiated, and top-line results may be possible as early as 2015. The non-small cell lung cancer and shingles trials in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline will read out in 2014. If any of these trials are positive, the stock could reverse from current levels.

Source: Despite MAGE-A3 Failure, William Blair And Maxim Analysts Are Still Bullish On Agenus

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)

SA.Pages.Article.handleDisclosures(); This article was sent to 1,203 people who get email alerts on  . Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Comments () This article has   comments. To read them or add your own, click here. The #1 Portfolio App is Now on iPad! Get instant notifications & never miss a critical update on your stocks! Which Seeking Alpha App is best for you? Seeking Alpha Portfolio Tech Investor ETF investor Energy Investor Email me a link to open from my phone: Continue 1,203  people received this article by email alert
Add your email to get alerts on   too: Get email alerts on   » This article was sent to 338,826 people who get the Investing Ideas newsletter. Get the Investing Ideas newsletter » Tagged: Investing Ideas, Long Ideas, Healthcare, Biotechnology Share this article with a colleague Tweet SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ new Ajax.Updater({success: 'widget_email_count'}, '/form/ajax_get_email_count', { method: 'get', parameters: { item_name: 'Article', article_id: '1676012' } }); }); BOOKMARKED / READ LATER Bookmarked

Added to your bookmarks on the Seeking Alpha homepage

Remove Bookmark new SA.Pages.Article.bookmark("_bottom"); var author_info_popup_timeout; Ben Yoffe picture About the author: Ben Yoffe Ben Yoffe picture Ben Yoffe is a professional biotech & healthcare investor and a writer from Israel. His goal is to highlight companies which he believes are offering compelling risk/reward opportunities. He believes in research, asking questions, and often reach out to analysts and CEOs regarding the... More Company: Ben Yoffe Ben Yoffe Articles (34) Comments (26) if (/stats viewer/.test(readCookie("user_perm"))) document.write("Earnings"); Profile 212 Followers 1 Following Follow.author_sidebar__follow_button_initiator('ben-yoffe') Send Message

Ben Yoffe

Stop Following

Ben Yoffe

SeekingAlpha.Initializer.onDOMLoad(function (){Follow.setFfToElements($('followers'),$('followings'),36112)}) About this author: Visit Blog:
Big Ben Investments if (getURLParam('source') == 'yahoo'){ $('yahoo_finance_link_container').innerHTML = 'back to yahoo finance'; } var page_ad_src = 'http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x251;x=x;tile=4;d=investing-ideas;pos=b;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'; add_js_to_ad_call('http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x250,300x600;x=x;tile=2;d=investing-ideas;pos=t;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'); SA.Utils.Ads.add({el:$('article_dart_sticky'), HadCreated:false, size:'300x250', delta:50, info:'http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/sek.investing-ideas/long-ideas;sz=300x251;x=x;tile=4;d=investing-ideas;pos=b;t=long-ideas;aid=1676012;d=investing-ideas;d=sectors;t=long-ideas;t=us;t=biotechnology;t=healthcare;t=article;z=1;a=ben-yoffe;cnt=7;cnt=20;cnt=25;pr=agen;s=gsk;s=agen;'+dart_my_vocation_and_profiles()+'ord='+ord+'?'}); if (SA.Pages.Article.see_sb_promo()){ var delegateObj = new Object(); SA.Utils.Ads.setDelegateIframeAction(delegateObj); delegateObj.loadIframeForElement = function(el) { if (el.id == "article_dart_sticky") setTimeout("SA.Pages.Article.freeze_arich_promo()",3000); } } TOP AUTHORS: The Opinion Leaders TOP USERS: StockTalkers | Instablogs Follow us Follow us Mobile Apps  |      RSS Feeds  |  About Us  |  Contact Us Terms of Use | Privacy | Xignite quote data | © 2013 Seeking Alpha document.observe('dom:loaded', function(){ if ($('article_source')) {$('article_source').hide();} if (!is_pro) {$$('.arich_promobox').each(function(o){o.show()})} SA.Pages.Article.primary = "agen"; SA.Pages.Article.init(); if (typeof(propromotion) != "undefined") {propromotion();} if (SA.Pages.Article.alpha_rich_article() || SA.Pages.Article.insiders_report_article()){ update_pro_tracker(0,1,0,0); } if (location.href.match(/source=[a-z0-9_]*email[a-z0-9_]*/)) {createCookie('camefromrta',true);} var pagination_version = ABTest.identity%10; if (SA.Pages.Article.is_roadblock()){ rb = new roadblock('article'); rb.register_show = SA.Pages.Article.roadshow; Mone.event(rb.type,rb.source,"Half Article"); SA.Pages.Article.cut_new(pagination_version); } else { if (!SA.Data.User.loggedIn() && (location.search.match(/[?&]source=(yahoo|nasdaq)/)) && !document.cookie.match(/\b(user_id|user_email|camefromrta)=/)) { SA.Pages.Article.hide_features_for_roadblock(); } } }); SeekingAlpha.Initializer.AddAfterLoad(function(){ SA.Pages.Article.articlePromo({"allSlugs":["gsk","agen"],"primarySlug":"agen","dashboard_id":10727,"dashboard_title":"Investing Ideas"}); }); .portfolio_news #content_wrapper .left_content .market_currents ul#mc_news li .bullet{* position: static;* padding:0 6px 6px 1px;}

View the original article here

Despite The Baby Blues, OvaScience Is A Strong Buy

A single "untitled" letter delivered by the FDA to OvaScience (OVAS) last week requesting more information regarding AUGMENT's (Autologous Germline Mitochondrial Energy Transfer) status as a human cellular and tissue-based product (HCT/P) has sent the company's shares tumbling more than 25% and given investors a case of the baby blues. Although, investors should be thoughtful as to what this new regulatory path, if needed, would mean for the timeline and cost to develop the product I believe the company has a sound strategy to mitigate any effects this delay may cause. The recent pullback in share price provides an excellent entry point for those wanting to invest in a novel scientific product that has the potential to revolutionize the expanding multi-billion dollar in vitro fertilization (IVF) market.

AUGMENT to the Rescue

For a couple struggling with infertility, there are few things in life more powerful than the desire to have children and be parents. As the age at which couples decide to have children continues to increase, it is no surprise that the number of women seeking infertility treatments has skyrocketed. Many women turn to the IVF approach ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) to increase their chances of conception. However, with a success rate of only 30% it typically takes several cycles for one to become pregnant. With an average cost of $16k per cycle for nondonor (from the mother) and $26k for donor eggs it is easy to understand why this is a billion dollar industry. In addition, current IVF treatments require grueling hormone injections and result in a high incidence of multiple births. OvaScience's AUGMENT is a groundbreaking product being developed to significantly increase a woman's chance of becoming pregnant with IVF and does not require hormonal stimulation or the additional risk of multiple births.

It is scientifically accepted that as a woman ages the quality of her eggs declines due to accumulating genomic mutations in the mitochondria, the eggs primary energy source, resulting in reduced fertility and increased birth defects. Therefore, by age 40 the chance of IVF success is less than 20%. Besides using a young donor egg with functioning mitochondria, there is nothing currently on the market that can increase egg quality and thus fertility. AUGMENT is that product.

There are few products in development that have as high a chance of success as AUGMENT due to the substantial amount of scientific proof of concept data available. Mitochondrial transfer has been shown to substantially increase egg quality and fertility in numerous animal studies and several human trials. In women who had previously failed 2 or more IVF cycles, the pregnancy success rate varied between 25% and 44% with close to 100% of those pregnancies resulting in live births.

Scientifically, it makes sense. Egg quality in older women is poor due to inefficient energy producing mitochondria, so the transfer of fresh mitochondria to the egg replenishes the energy needed to achieve fertilization and early embryo growth. However, since the majority of these studies used donor mitochondria from another individual, the FDA stepped in due to the concerns of mixing mitochondrial DNA from two different individuals.

To avoid this complication, OvaScience uses a unique source of mitochondria isolated from a woman's own germline egg stem cells (EggPC) discovered by their cofounder Dr. Jonathan Tilly while at Harvard Medical School. These mitochondria are then injected back into the woman's own egg along with the male sperm for fertilization. Importantly these EggPCs contain high levels of ATP, energy produced by the mitochondria, making them ideal to replenish the energy levels of the egg. Therefore, there is no reason why IVF success rates would not increase the same if not more than previous mitochondrial transfer studies using this novel technique and cell source.

The Future of AUGMENT

The stock tanked over 25% following OvaScience receiving the "untitled" letter from the FDA questioning the status of AUGMENT as a 361 HCT/P product, which does not require extensive clinical trials or pre-market approval. It must be kept in mind that although OvaScience has been in contact with the FDA regarding their study, apparently the FDA has not been supplied with all the study details. Therefore, the letter from the FDA requesting more information regarding AUGMENT should be seen as just that. OvaScience and all other analysts whose opinions I've read believe AUGMENT qualifies as a 361 HCT/P. After reviewing the requirements I also agree it should fit this status. Importantly, OvaScience's counsel Peter Hutt, who is the former Chief Counsel for the FDA also believes AUGMENT should be regulated under 361 HCT/P and will discuss this with the FDA along with OvaScience senior management. When one looks at the requirements for 361 HCT/P status AUGMENT fits them all.

• Cells or tissue need to have minimal manipulation: AUGMENT techniques do not change the biological characteristics of the mitochondria and no cell culture is required.

• Intended for homologous use: AUGMENT uses a woman's own mitochondria from EggPCs to supplement mitochondria in the woman's egg.

• Its manufacture does not involve combination with another article, except for water, crystalloids, or a sterilizing, preserving, or storage agent (not raising new clinical safety concerns for the HCT/P): AUGMENT mitochondria are isolated and placed in standard buffer for transport.

• It does not have a systemic effect and is not dependent upon the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function or, if it has such an effect, it is intended for autologous use or allogeneic use in close relatives or for reproductive use: AUGMENT is autologous and is for reproductive use.

Due to AUGMENT meeting all the criteria to be regulated under 361 HCT/P I believe further detailed discussions between OvaScience and the FDA will clarify its regulatory status. If the FDA does not agree and still insists that AUGMENT needs to be regulated as a new investigational drug, then they should redefine the criteria for a HCT/P as AUGMENT clearly meets the current descriptions. Although, these trials would be costly and time consuming to conduct, there is no reason to believe OvaScience would not be successful in demonstrating efficacy and safety. From the recent conference call OvaScience held regarding AUGMENT updates, it was mentioned that some of the data they have already accumulated may be able to be used and other studies that the FDA may require regarding safety were already underway. Due to the stock dropping rapidly following the FDA letter, many law firms are trying to rally class action lawsuits against OvaScience. These are typical lawsuit trolls who are trying to recruit a lead plaintiff and bank some quick money. As most investors know, these lawyers pop up everywhere as soon as a stock's value declines rapidly and very rarely succeed. I think most smart investors in OvaScience realized not meeting HCT/P status was a possibility.

AUGMENT Launch Overseas in 2014

Regardless of the outcome of the US regulatory status of AUGMENT, OvaScience continues to push forward with its plans for 2014 overseas product enrollment and launch. In fact, the majority of global IVF treatment occurs outside the US, mainly in Japan and Europe, which combined, represents more than 4 times the number of IVF cycles in the US. It is important to note, that IVF is typically paid for by people in cash and not normally covered by insurance plans. Therefore, unlike many medical services that must wait 60-180 days for insurance reimbursement, OvaScience would recognize revenue upon completion of service. Moreover, the exorbitant cost of an IVF cycle typically restricts those who use it to the middle, upper class in the US. If AUGMENT can save a couple 1 or 2 cycles of IVF treatment or if standard IVF is simply not working, I would not be surprised to see a high number of couples take the flight overseas to be treated, especially since insurance coverage is not a factor. It is not uncommon to see US couples travel overseas to adopt children, perhaps they would do the same to conceive their own.

OvaTure Overlooked

Although Wall Street is currently focused on AUGMENT, OvaScience's other product in development OvaTure has the potential to change the way IVF is practiced. The OvaTure product takes a woman's own egg stem cells, EggPC, which are free from accumulated genomic mutations and cultures them to create new fresh mature eggs, which can then be fertilized. This product would greatly increase the age at which women could become pregnant. Proof of principle studies have been conducted in mouse models and human EggPCs have been shown to be capable of maturing into eggs. It is likely that the FDA will require regulatory approval for this product as there is cell differentiation and cell culture involved. However, if trials are successful, the product would be groundbreaking.

Potential Risks

As with all small biotech companies there are always risks that need to be taken into account. The main concern of investors has already been factored into the stock and that was the regulatory status of AUGMENT in the US. Although, I believe there is still a good possibility the FDA will agree that the product should be regulated as an HCT/P once provided more details, this is not a guarantee. If time consuming studies are needed to satisfy the FDA then OvaScience may need to raise additional funds. However, revenue from a successful overseas launch could help pay the bills.

Other Important Factors to Consider

In addition to their revolutionary products for the rapidly growing IVF market, there are several other factors that make OvaScience a very attractive investment. There is little to no competition in the space, which will allow OvaScience to capture the majority of the IVF business. Due to the lack of advancements in IVF, OvaScience's AUGMENT product has already gained strong traction in the US with enrollment filled for the AUGMENT study before suspension and numerous advocacy groups lobbying to bring the product to market. Likewise, OvaScience's approaches have been well accepted by the major fertility clinics with a lot of the thought leaders in the field on their Scientific and Product Advisory boards. Importantly, OvaScience also has an executive team, which is second to none. The CEO, Michelle Dipp, M.D., Ph.D has a track record of success, leading the acquisition of her last company Sirtris to GSK for over $700 million and is also the founder of a high profile healthcare investment fund. It is also important to note that many of the senior team members have been actively buying up the stock, including the Dr. Dipp who just entered into a 10b5-1 stock purchase plan.

Conclusion

I believe OvaScience's unique AUGMENT product has a very high chance of success and investors should not be deterred by the FDA asking for more information regarding how the product should be regulated. Worst case scenario, AUGMENT is launched first into the overseas market. This definitely does not warrant the over 30% drop in value the stock has relinquished since last week. OvaScience is a unique play in the rapidly growing IVF market and at these levels is a bargain for investors.

Disclosure: I am long OVAS. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Monday, 9 September 2013

Pfizer Looks Good Despite Disappointing Eliquis Sales

Pfizer (PFE) developed Eliquis in collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) and was approved by the FDA in December 2012. Sales estimates expected the drug to reach $4 billion in 4-5 years but the results were disappointing, with just $12 million in sales during Q2 2013. Nevertheless, I shall discuss why this drug still holds promise and why Pfizer is particularly poised to gain from Eliquis.

What Is Eliquis?

Eliquis, commonly known as Apaxiban, belonging to the family of anticoagulants, prevents the formation of blood clots especially in patients who have had elective hip and knee replacement surgery. It is also used for prevention of clots in patients with atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder) thus, lowering the risk of stroke.

The drug is a major achievement as it can be used in both short and long term treatment of Venous thromboembolism. It will give Pfizer a major boost in its revenues after it saw some decrease in sales initially due to the loss of Lipitor's patent, the company's famous blood cholesterol drug.

The impressive study

Researchers proved Eliquis' worth with the successful completion of its 3rd phase of clinical trial for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. The study conducted on a sample size of 4,808 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients revealed that Eliquis matches the standard utility of age-old anticoagulant warfarin.

It can be successfully used for treatment of venous thrombosis ((VT)) and pulmonary embolism (PE) without constant surveillance and dietary restrictions as in the case of warfarin. It also showed reduction in cases of major bleeding in contrast to usage of warfarin and heparin, another blood thinner typically given to warfarin patients in the early part of treatment.

What is Venous Thromboembolism?

Typically, deep venous thrombosis refers to the blood clot in veins which, if in case breaks away, goes to the heart and ultimately to the lungs causing pulmonary embolism. In the U.S. around 900,000 people suffer from this fatal condition every year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

In October, last year, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb entered into a joint agreement with Portola Pharmaceuticals to advance the scientific understanding of the role of PRT4445 as a potential antidote for Eliquis. The drug was developed in a joint venture by Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb. It helps to reduce the risk of bleeding that is associated with anticoagulants like Eliquis.

A competitor that dropped out of anticoagulant race

Merck (MRK) gave up its oral anticoagulant betrixaban as the drug did not satisfy questions about its efficacy. Moreover, competition for Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb may have forced Merck to give up on its anticoagulant drug as well. Merck had paid $50 million to Portola way back in 2009 in hopes of developing cardiovascular drugs. Certainly, the loss of betrixaban hit Merck pretty hard. If Merck had met all the milestones, it would have struck a deal worth $420 million with the help of the oral anticoagulant.

Conclusion

With a market cap of $188 billion and an enterprise value of $189 billion, Pfizer is one of the largest companies in the world. However, the company is walking in overvalued territory with a PEG ratio of 4.29. To make up for this, the company has a good revenue figure of $57 billion.

The company's 5-year average dividend yield is 4.40%, which is on the lower side but is good for those who want to save on taxes. With an operating cash flow of $16 billion, Pfizer has enough money to develop newer and more effective drugs that will generate profit and revenue for the company.

Eliquis is not an early entrant in the market as Pradaxa and Xarelto, due to which it saw its sales lagging. Recent studies about the drug's relative safety over its competitors will likely boost its sales. Moreover, Eliquis can also be used for other conditions as I have described above.

All these factors boost investor confidence and brighten long-term sales forecasts for Pfizer. Besides this, there is a major strategy chalked out by the company to lift the sale of its off-patent drug Lipitor with its projected sales pegged at $3 billion. Pfizer stock is definitely going to be one of the more interesting and promising big pharma stocks.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article. (More...)


View the original article here

Friday, 16 August 2013

Few survivors of head and neck cancer utilizing mental health services despite depression

Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Depression;  Mental Health
Article Date: 15 Aug 2013 - 13:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Few survivors of head and neck cancer utilizing mental health services despite depression
not yet ratednot yet rated

Mental health services appear to be underutilized despite depression among survivors of head and neck cancer, according to a study published Online First by JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery.

The long-term physical effects of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer have been well described but few studies have examined psychosocial functioning, including depression, among patients, according to the study background.

Allen M. Chen, M.D., of the University of California, Davis, and now of the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, and colleagues examined the prevalence of self-reported depression among survivors of head and neck cancer returning for follow-up after RT treatment.

The study included 211 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, who had been treated and were disease-free with at least one year of follow-up. A questionnaire was used to analyze rates of depression.

The proportion of patients who reported their mood as "somewhat depressed" or "extremely depressed" was 17 percent, 15 percent and 13 percent at one, three and five years, respectively. Among the patients who reported their mood as either "somewhat depressed" or "extremely depressed," at one, three and five years, respectively, the proportion of patients using antidepressants was 6 percent, 11 percent and 0 percent, respectively. The proportion of patients actively undergoing or seeking psychotherapy and/or counseling was 3 percent, 6 percent and 0 percent, respectively, according to study results.

"Despite a relatively high rate of depression among patients with head and neck cancer in the post-RT setting, mental health services are severely underutilized," the study concludes.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online August 15, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4072.

JAMA

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

JAMA. "Few survivors of head and neck cancer utilizing mental health services despite depression." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 15 Aug. 2013. Web.
15 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Few survivors of head and neck cancer utilizing mental health services despite depression'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here