Showing posts with label possible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label possible. Show all posts

Friday, 16 August 2013

Possible new avenues for gene therapy via enhancer RNAs

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our genetics section for the latest news on this subject.

Postdoctoral Researcher Minna U. Kaikkonen at A.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences at the University of Eastern Finland was one of the two lead authors of the current study, carried out under Professor Christopher Glass. Dr Kaikkonen completed her post doc study in Professor Glass' research group at the University of California, San Diego in 2009. Besides Dr Kaikkonen, the UEF contributors to the earlier study from June also include Postdoctoral Researcher Hanna P. Lesch.

The main funders of the study are Fondation Leducq, Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, the Academy of Finland, ASLA Fulbright, the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, the Finnish Cultural Foundation (North Savo Regional Fund), Orion-Farmos Research Foundation and the US National Institutes of Health grants DK091183, CA17390, and DK063491.

Research article in Molecular Cell:

Remodeling of the Enhancer Landscape during Macrophage Activation Is Coupled to Enhancer Transcription

Kaikkonen MU, Spann N, Heinz S, Romanoski CE, Allison KA, Stender JD, Chun HB, Tough DF, Prinjha RK, Benner C and Glass CK. Remodeling of the enhancer landscape during macrophage activation is linked to enhancer transcription. Molecular cell, 2013; Volume 51, Issue 3, 310-325;10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.010

Research article in Nature:

Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription

Lam MTY, Cho H, Lesch HP, Heinz S, Tanaka-Oishi Y, Benner C, Kaikkonen MU, Salim A, Kosaka M, Lee CY, Watt A, Grossman T, Rosenfeld MG, Evans RM, Glass CK. Rev-Erbs negatively regulate macrophage gene expression by repressing enhancer-directed transcription. Nature 2013 Jun 27; 498(7455):511-5; doi:10.1038/nature12209

University of Eastern Finland

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

University of Eastern Finland. "Possible new avenues for gene therapy via enhancer RNAs." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 15 Aug. 2013. Web.
15 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


View the original article here

Monday, 29 July 2013

Ventilation in OR may be affected by patient warming systems, with possible impact on infection risk

Main Category: Public Health
Also Included In: Infectious Diseases / Bacteria / Viruses
Article Date: 28 Jul 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Ventilation in OR may be affected by patient warming systems, with possible impact on infection risk
not yet ratednot yet rated

Forced-air systems used to keep patients warm during surgery may affect the performance of operating room (OR) ventilation systems - potentially increasing exposure to airborne contaminants, reports a study in the August issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, official journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society (IARS).

By comparison, conductive warming systems don't disrupt ventilation airflows over the surgical site, according to the report by Dr Kumar G. Belani of University of Minnesota and colleagues. But an accompanying editorial notes that there's not yet enough evidence to change current practice with regard to patient warming in the OR.

Patient Warming Affects OR Ventilation Airflow The researchers compared the effects of two different types of patient warming systems on airflow in the OR. Modern ORs use "sophisticated ventilation systems to create localized zones of highly filtered air over the surgical site," according to Dr Belani and coauthors.

For the experimental study, the researchers set up an OR as for knee replacement surgery, using a mannequin. They then assessed the performance of the OR ventilation system using "neutrally buoyant detergent bubbles," which made it possible to visualize airflow patterns under different conditions.

Airflow was compared using a forced-air warming system, which distributes heated air under the surgical drapes and over the patient; and a conductive warming system (such as heated water blankets), which applies direct heat to the patient's skin.

Forced-air warming "generated hot air convection currents that mobilized bubbles over the anesthesia site and into the surgical site," Dr Belani and colleagues write. The average "bubble count" in the simulated surgical field was more than 100 with the forced-air warmer, compared to about 0.50 with a conductive warming system.

The convection currents created by the forced-air system drew air from under the surgical drapes and into the surgical site. The concern is that this could mobilize bacteria or other contaminants from nonsterile areas, or interfere with the ventilation system's ability to clear contaminants from the surgical site.

Too Early to Assume Increased Infection Risk? The use of " downward displacement" OR ventilation systems had previously been shown to reduce exposure to microbes and infection rates during certain types of surgery. But more recent studies have found no reduction in infection rates. The new study was designed to test whether forced-air warming systems - a relatively recent introduction to ORs - could be affecting ventilation performance.

The results suggest that forced-air patient warming systems may indeed affect airflows in the OR, potentially increasing exposure to bacteria and other contaminants during surgery. Dr Belani and coauthors conclude, "These findings warrant future research into the effects of forced air warming excess heat on clinical outcomes during contamination-sensitive surgery."

In the editorial, Drs Charles Weissman and W. Bosseau Murray note that the findings provide only indirect evidence of potential infection risk, in a simulated setting. That's in contrast to the known benefits of preventing drops in body temperature during surgery. Pending further research, Drs Weissman and Murray write, "[T]he prudent course...might be to continue with the presently proven successful warming therapies, but keep an open mind about the possible future need to change practice."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our public health section for the latest news on this subject.

Read the article in Anesthesia & Analgesia: http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/content/117/2/406.full?. The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, part of Wolters Kluwer Health.

Wolters Kluwer Health

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Health, Wolters Kluwer. "Ventilation in OR may be affected by patient warming systems, with possible impact on infection risk." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 28 Jul. 2013. Web.
29 Jul. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Ventilation in OR may be affected by patient warming systems, with possible impact on infection risk'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Friday, 26 July 2013

Planting false memories is possible, say neuroscientists

Featured Article
Main Category: Neurology / Neuroscience
Also Included In: Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 25 Jul 2013 - 11:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Planting false memories is possible, say neuroscientists
5 starsnot yet rated

Have you ever recalled a memory and wondered if it actually happened? It sounds like something from a science fiction film, but a team of neuroscientists from MIT have demonstrated an ability to implant false memories into mice brains.

A study published today in Science reports the team's findings. Along with the ability to create fictitious recollections, the researchers also discovered that, neurologically speaking, traces of the false memories are dead ringers for authentic memories.

These memory traces are known as "engrams" to neuroscientists, and the locations of these engrams have been of interest to researchers for quite some time.

In the past, Susumu Tonegawa, senior author of the paper, and her team have identified cells from an engram for particular memories, and they have been able to reactivate those particular memories using a technology called "optogenetics." This technology enables neurologists to selectively turn cells on or off using light.

To plant memories in mice, Tonegawa and her team used channelrhodopsin, a protein that activates neurons when it is stimulated by light. The cells in the hippocampus of the mice were engineered so that they would express the gene for channelrhodoposin. Whenever a gene necessary for memory formation (c-fos) was turned on, channelrhodoposin would be produced.

Research scientist Xu Liu said:

"Compared to most studies that treat the brain as a black box while trying to access it from the outside in, this is like we are trying to study the brain from the inside out.

The technology we developed for this study allows us to fine-dissect and even potentially tinker with the memory process by directly controlling the brain cells."

The experiment proceeded as follows:

Day 1: the researchers put the mice in chamber A and allowed them to run around freely, meanwhile labeling their memory cells with channelrhodopsinDay 2: the researchers put the mice in chamber B, which was quite different from chamber A. Eventually, the mice were shocked mildly on their foot while researchers activated the memory cells from chamber A with lightDay 3: the researchers put the mice back in chamber A.

When the mice were placed back in chamber A on the third day, they "froze in fear," even though they were never shocked there.

The reason why the mice feared the memory of chamber A is that the researchers implanted a false memory of being shocked in it. In effect, the mice were reliving the memory of being in chamber A while they were being shocked in chamber B, and therefore now feared chamber A.

The researchers note that the false memory they implanted in the mice seemed to compete with the real memory of chamber B. Though the mice also froze when they were placed in chamber B, they did not freeze quite as much as those mice that received a chamber B shock without having chamber A memories activated.

Anyone who watched the 2010 sci-fi thriller Inception starring Leonardo DiCaprio will understand that there are serious implications involved with having the ability to alter human memory. And the scientists are already planning future studies around how memories can be altered in the brain.

But the research team from MIT is optimistic about how these findings may help people in the future. Lead author Steve Ramirez says:

"Now that we can reactivate and change the contents of memories in the brain, we can begin asking questions that were once the realm of philosophy.

Are there multiple conditions that lead to the formation of false memories? Can false memories for both pleasurable and aversive events be artificially created? What about false memories for more than just contexts - false memories for objects, food or other mice?

These are the once seemingly sci-fi questions that can now be experimentally tackled in the lab."

For now, we can relax knowing that our memories are own. Those that we remember, anyway.

Written by Marie Ellis


Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today Visit our neurology / neuroscience section for the latest news on this subject.

“Neuroscientists show ability to plant false memories,” Anne Trafton, MIT News Office.

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Ellis, Marie. "Planting false memories is possible, say neuroscientists." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 25 Jul. 2013. Web.
26 Jul. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Planting false memories is possible, say neuroscientists'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here