Showing posts with label those. Show all posts
Showing posts with label those. Show all posts

Thursday, 12 September 2013

Telehealth: let's hear from those who have used it

Home Health Care 'Patients and carers should be asked what they want telehealth to do for them,' argues Lynn Young, ' … how they think it can enhance their lives.' Photograph: Alamy

Few people working in the highly charged world of healthcare will be surprised – or sad – to learn that the 3millionlives group has been disbanded. Since its inception in 2011, despite its original claim that three million people could benefit from the informed and appropriate use of telehealth, the widely held view is that any significant added value and health improvement has not yet been achieved.

Perhaps the problem – and, therefore, the cause of lack of progress – is that its structure and focus was misguided, although it held the very best of intentions. It was made up entirely of people working in industry, which resulted in polarised views, rather than the action required to promote telehealth successfully.

We are now told that the 3millionlives group will be replaced by another structure with the grander title of Integrated care for 3millionlives stakeholder forum. Apparently, it is likely to include clinical leaders, representatives from healthcare provider organisations, the third sector and local government. There is, however, an obvious absence – the most important people of all: patients and carers.

Genuine and effective grass roots engagement and the development of integrated care pathways can only be achieved if all parts of the multi-disciplinary and multi-agency team work together with a common purpose – the proper use of telehealth technology. From day one, within this team, there must be the patients and carers who have the strong desire and motivation to transform their lives through the use of modern technology.

The 3millionlives campaign aimed to recruit patients to telehealth, yet, two years in a row, research commissioned by the Telehealth Forum revealed that 90% of people are unaware of what telehealth is, and what it can do in terms of individual health improvement. Among the over-55s, who are statistically more likely to have a long-term condition, 92% have no understanding of what telehealth is. We cannot expect people to use telehealth to help manage their long-term condition if they are completely unaware of the available technology, and therefore ignorant of its potential benefits.

It is important to understand that telehealth is not appropriate for all people who live with one or more long-term conditions, but it is essential for the people who could benefit from it to be identified and encouraged to use it. Patients and carers should be asked what they want the technology to do for them, what they like and dislike about it and exactly how they want it to enhance their quality of life. Telehealth services can easily be adapted and tailored to meet the individual preferences and needs of the people using it.

If telehealth is to achieve its potential, we must develop a network of patient advocates. Telehealth cynics are advised to listen to patients such as Terry, who offered a most compelling argument for the widespread use of this technology at an event in Newham in east London. He eloquently described using telehealth as "having angels in the house", and how since his epiphany, has recommended it to his friends whom he thought could benefit from it.

Terry has also taken on the role of teacher to those who have been persuaded to "have a go" at telehealth. Word of mouth and recommendations from an experienced friend or relative is the surest route to expanding its proper use.

The Department of Health needs to be ambitious in terms of telehealth becoming the norm, rather than the extraordinary, and understand that a change in culture can only happen if enthusiasts, such as Terry are given a public platform to extol its virtues. So, my plea is that we must hear more from the people using telehealth and maybe a little less from those who produce and sell it.

Lynn Young is a former district nurse and primary care adviser to the Royal College of Nursing. She is also a member of the Self Care Forum

This article is published by Guardian Professional. Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to receive regular emails and exclusive offers.


View the original article here

Friday, 16 August 2013

Those who often recall their dreams respond more strongly to their name

Main Category: Psychology / Psychiatry
Article Date: 15 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Those who often recall their dreams respond more strongly to their name
3 starsnot yet rated

Dreaming remains one of the great mysteries of human cognition. It is still not fully known when dreams occur, and which mechanisms in the brain produce them. A major difficulty for studying dreams is that they leave only a fleeting memory upon awakening.

Perrine Ruby and colleagues from the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center chose a new approach to investigate dreaming. They recorded brain activity of two groups of participants: high dream recallers who recall dreams nearly every day and low dream recallers who recall a dream once or twice a month. Brain activity (electroencephalogram) was recorded while they were hearing first names before and during sleep.

From the analysis of oscillatory brain signals, high and low dream recallers were found to differentially process first names during wakefulness, suggesting different functional organization of the brain in the two groups. Moreover, high dream recallers showed more intra-sleep wakefulness than low dream recallers.

Together with previous findings, these results suggest a greater brain reactivity in high than in low dream recallers which would facilitate awakenings during sleep and therefore dream memorisation

Article title: Alpha reactivity to first names differs in subjects with high and low dream recall frequency

Journal: Frontiers in Psychology; DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00419 Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our psychology / psychiatry section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Frontiers. "Those who often recall their dreams respond more strongly to their name." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 15 Aug. 2013. Web.
15 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Those who often recall their dreams respond more strongly to their name'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

The recession hits those with mental health problems harder

Main Category: Mental Health
Also Included In: Public Health
Article Date: 30 Jul 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
The recession hits those with mental health problems harder
not yet ratednot yet rated

Since the start of the recession, the rate of unemployment for people with mental health problems has risen more than twice as much than for people without mental health problems, according to new research from King's College London.

The authors warn that, across Europe, people with mental health problems have been disproportionately affected by the economic crisis, further increasing social exclusion amongst this vulnerable group.

Published in PLOS ONE, the study also found that this gap in employment rates was even greater for men and for those with low levels of education.

The scientists collected data in 27 EU countries from over 20,000 people in 2006 and again in 2010. By using the Eurobarometer survey, they assessed mental health, stigmatising attitudes, socio-demographic information (such as age, gender, education level and urbanicity) and current employment rate.

In 2006, unemployment was at 7.1% for people without mental health problems, compared to 12.7% for people with mental health problems. In 2010, this rose to 9.8% and 18.2% respectively, corresponding to an increase of 5.5% for people with mental health problems vs 2.7% increase for people without mental health problems.

Dr Sara Evans-Lacko, lead author of the study from King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry, says: "The economic recession has had enormous impact across much of Europe, but there is little information about the specific impact of the recession on groups who are already vulnerable to social exclusion, specifically, people with mental health problems. This is the first study to show that the European economic crisis has had a profound impact on people with mental health problems, compared to those without."

In addition, the study identified important sub-groups - for example, the study found that men and individuals with lower levels of education had a significantly greater increase in the likelihood of being unemployed after the recession. In 2010, 21.7% of men with mental health problems were unemployed, compared to 13.7% in 2006.

The study also showed that stigmatising attitudes, especially beliefs regarding dangerousness of people with mental health problems were an important factor contributing to the rise in unemployment. Living in a country where a higher proportion of individuals believed that people with mental health problems were dangerous was associated with higher levels of unemployment for people with mental health problems.

In addition to having lower levels of employment, these subgroups also have lower rates of help-seeking and more negative attitudes to mental health and may require specific forms of outreach.

Professor Graham Thornicroft, co-author of the study from King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry, adds: "Our study emphasises that one important implication of stigma and discrimination is exclusion from employment. During periods of economic recession, attitudes to people with mental health problems may harden, further deepening social exclusion. Governments need to be aware of these risks, and employers need to be aware of their legal duty to comply with the Equality Act to support people with mental health problems coming into, and staying in, employment."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our mental health section for the latest news on this subject.

Paper reference: Evans-Lacko, S. et al "The mental health consequences of the recession: economic hardship and employment of people with mental health problems in 27 European countries" PLOS ONE

Link to the live article: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069792

King's College London

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

London, King\'s College. "The recession hits those with mental health problems harder." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 30 Jul. 2013. Web.
30 Jul. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'The recession hits those with mental health problems harder'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Thursday, 25 July 2013

Home improvement for those with poor health saves hospitals money

Disabled male in wheel chair in a residential home. Adapting the homes of wheelchair users saved a London borough £30,000 per client. Photograph: Janine Wiedel Photolibrary / Ala/Alamy

Countless reports have called for greater collaborative working between the housing sector and health care providers, specifically with the view of creating lasting homes where care and support can be given to help those with poor health, as well as those recovering from long-term illnesses.

Looking at the connection between health and housing is a logical starting point, but how does it work in practice?

Part of my frontline role for a home improvement agency in the east of England is to promote the services we provide. We target GPs and hospitals, as our services could benefit their patients – specifically those who can not be discharged from hospital due to their housing conditions – but getting a foot in the door is often the biggest obstacle.

I have arranged meetings with surgery managers to discuss how we can work in partnership but arrive to find they are too busy to see me. However, when I chat with others about the services we provide, they can see how the work we docan prevent hospital admission. The housing sector needs to get to those involved in the decision making.

Perhaps the biggest barrier to overcome is funding. Last year, the Department of Health allocated an additional £20m for disabled facility grant funding, the finance mechanism for disability aids and adaptations. Typically, local authorities would have to pay for 40% of the grant but this has now changed and councils are no longer required to top up or match government funding.

Adaptations effectively pay for themselves while taking pressure off our already stretched health service. A report published last year by the London School of Economics highlighted an example of one London borough that had two wheelchair users in residential care due to the condition of their homes. Adapting the properties and making them fit for purpose saved £30,000 per client. Another local authority reported reductions in care costs of almost £2m over a five-year period as a direct result of investing £110,000 in 20 shower adaptations. These cost savings could be replicated by a consistent, collaborative working approach.

We do have a positive working relationship with Norwich city council and the Suffolk district councils who understand what we are trying to achieve. The councils recognise the link between housing and health and boast impressive turnaround times for their adaptations. The average wait in Norwich for an adaptation is between four and six months, compared to up to three years in some parts of the country. It is this forward thinking that we need to make a positive impact on what we and the health services provide.

Alan Sharman is casework team leader at Orbit Care and Repair

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. Join the housing network for more news, analysis and comment direct to you


View the original article here