Thursday 15 August 2013

Low Risk Ankle Rule clinical trial

Main Category: Bones / Orthopedics
Also Included In: Radiology / Nuclear Medicine;  Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 14 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
Low Risk Ankle Rule clinical trial
not yet ratednot yet rated

Radiography is widely used in diagnosing ankle injuries, with 85%-95% in pediatric injuries, although only 12% of these show fractures.

"Radiography is unnecessary for most children's ankle injuries, and these high rates of radiography needlessly expose children to radiation and are a questionable use of resources," writes Dr. Kathy Boutis, a pediatric emergency department physician at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) and the University of Toronto, with coauthors.

The Low Risk Ankle Rule is highly accurate at identifying fractures and can potentially reduce the need for radiography by 60%. It states that if a child with an ankle injury has a low-risk examination, ankle radiography may not be necessary to further exclude a high-risk ankle injury. If a subset of minor lateral ankle fractures is missed, evidence shows that these are exceptionally stable and low risk for any future issues and can be treated like an ankle sprain. Reducing radiography can lower exposure to low levels of radiation, contain costs and speed up treatment.

Researchers implemented the Low Risk Ankle Rule in 6 Canadian emergency departments to determine whether it reduced the use of radiography in children. The study involved 2151 patients (1055 at intervention and 1096 at control sites) between the ages of 3 and 16 years who presented at an emergency department with a nonpenetrating ankle injury. By applying the rule, the use of ankle radiography was reduced by about 22%. This reduction was consistent in different emergency departments and is similar to the Ottawa Ankle Rule used with adults.

"The implementation of the Low Risk Ankle Rule led to a significant decrease in imaging, associated increase in clinically important fractures being missed or decrease in patient or physician satisfaction," write the authors. "The ankle rule has potential broad applicability to emergency departments throughout most of the developed world, and widespread implementation of this rule could safely lead to reduction of unnecessary radiography in this radiosensitive population and a more efficient use of health care resources."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our bones / orthopedics section for the latest news on this subject.

Effect of the Low Risk Ankle Rule on the frequency of radiography in children with ankle injuries

Kathy Boutis, Paul Grootendorst, Andrew Willan, Amy C. Plint, Paul Babyn, Robert J. Brison, Arun Sayal, Melissa Parker, Natalie Mamen, Suzanne Schuh, Jeremy Grimshaw, David Johnson, Unni Narayanan. CMAJ August 12, 2013 First published August 12, 2013, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.122050

Canadian Medical Association Journal

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Canadian Medical Association Journal. "Low Risk Ankle Rule clinical trial." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 14 Aug. 2013. Web.
14 Aug. 2013. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


'Low Risk Ankle Rule clinical trial'

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment